It is common to work with unbounded operators in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory (such as position and momentum operators in QM and field operators and their conjugate momenta in QFT) and it is common practice to use their eigenvectors as a complete orthonormal basis for the Hilbert space. However, since these are unbounded operators, they can only be defined on a dense subspace of the Hilbert space (even if we close them). Hence, It is not clear to me if it would be a valid assumption to consider the eigenvectors of these operators as a complete basis! I would appreciate your comments on this assumption and if there is a way to fix this.
2026-03-25 11:10:49.1774437049
Do Eigenvectors of an unbounded operator form a complete basis?
529 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Related Questions in QUANTUM-FIELD-THEORY
- Conserved currents under Lorentz Transformations
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Complex Gaussian integral
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- QFT, more a QM Question, Hamiltonian relation time evolution
- Spinor chiral transformation by $\psi \to \gamma^5 \psi$
- How are topological invariants obtained from TQFTs used in practice?
- Computing energy-momentum tensor with arrowed Feynman slash derivative
- Feynman Vertex Rule, Correlator, 2 diff coupling constants, why no-cross terms
- QFT, Noether and Invariance, Complex fields, Equal mass
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I assume you mean to ask if eigenvectors of (essentially) self-adjoint operators form a complete (dense) basis. Without the self-adjointedness requirement the statement is not even true in finite dimension. Instead I suppose you are interested to see how the finite dimensional result generalizes.
The short answer to your question is no. A self-adjoint operator on an infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces can have no eigenvector. The operator itself need not be unbounded either. The multiplication operator by a bounded function is bounded but has no eigenvector.
If you ask for a generalization of a finite dimensional version of the spectral theorem for infinite dimensional Hilbert space there is one which makes sense (also mentioned in the comments). Namely, you know that a finite dimensional Hermitian matrix can be diagonalized by a unitary operator. This version essentially still holds in infinite dimensions. Namely, any self-ajoint operator is unitary equivalent to a multiplication operator in a suitable measure space.
If you think about it long enough you should realize that the operator multiplication by a function is the equivalent of multiplication by a diagonal matrix in finite dimension, except that "position basis" has a different meaning in the two contexts.
A simple example of how this works is given by the following operator on $\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})$:
$$ H |n\rangle = |n+1\rangle + |n-1\rangle $$
where $|n\rangle$ is the vector with one at position $n$ and zero everywhere else. This operator (defined on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space) is unitarily equivalent to multiplication by $2 \cos(k)$. You can see this answer for the explicit construction of the unitary map.