Let $K$ be a field and $Ω$ an algebraically closed field that contains $K$. Is it the case that for every algebraic extension $L/K$, that $L ⊆ Ω$? Intuitively this makes sense because colloquially, $Ω$ "is the largest algebraic extension of $K$". I cannot, however, formally exclude yet that neither $L ⊆ Ω$ nor $Ω ⊆ L$ holds. I suspect there must be a quick and simple argument that shows that one of the inclusions (or rather, embeddings) must hold.
2026-02-23 06:42:03.1771828923
Does an algebraically closed field contain all algebraic field extensions?
434 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in SEPARABLE-EXTENSION
- Find the degree of splitting field of a separable polynomial over finite field
- If $\alpha$ separable over $F$ then $F(\alpha )/F$ is a separable extension.
- non separable, non normal, finite field extension
- Is $\mathbb{F}_q(x)$ a perfect field?
- Does a finite $[E:K]_s$ imply that $[E_s:K]$ is finite?
- Converse to Prop. V.6.11 from Lang's *Algebra*: $E/k$ normal $\impliedby E^{\operatorname{Aut}(E/k)}/k $ purely inseparable?
- If $E/k$ is not separable, but satisfies the property that there exists a positive integer $n$ for which every $\alpha \in E$ of degree less than $n$
- Let $L/K$ be a finite separable field extension. How to prove there are finitely many intermediate fields?
- Prove this field extension is separable
- $\mathbb F_p(t) \leq L $ a finite extension
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The statement in your question is incorrect. You cannot define the algebraic closure to be the union of all algebraic extensions. The basic problem is that you can add any element in when you extend a field. For example when we go from the reals to the complex numbers we add in an element $i$ according to the rule that $i^2 = -1$. We could equally have used in the place of $i$ any thing you could dream of so that if an algebraic closure was to contain every algebraic extension then as a set it would have to contain everything which is not possible. The standard proof of this uses Zorn's lemma to get around this problem