Does convergence of arithmetic mean imply convergence of geometric mean?

129 Views Asked by At

Let $x_n$ be a sequence of positive real numbers, which is not convergent. ($x_n$ does not converge to a finite number, nor to infinity). Define

$$ A_n = \frac{x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n}{n} \quad \text{ and }\quad G_n = \sqrt[n]{x_1x_2...x_n}.$$

Does the convergence of $A_n$ imply the convergence of $G_n$ or vice versa?

I know that if $x_n \to L \in \mathbb{R}\cup\{\infty\}$, then both $A_n,G_n$ converge to $L$. But here I assume $x_n$ is not convergent.

I also wonder if adding a boundedness assumption on $x_n$ changes anything.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

4
On BEST ANSWER

This is a partial negative answer. Consider $$a_n = \begin{cases} n & \text{if $n$ is odd}, \\ \frac{1}{n-1} & \text{if $n$ is even}. \end{cases}$$ Then $$A_n \geq \frac{\frac{(n+1)^2}{4}}{n} \to \infty,$$ but $$G_n = \begin{cases} \sqrt[n]{n} & \text{if $n$ is odd}, \\ 1 & \text{if $n$ is even} \end{cases} \to 1.$$ Also note that even if both limits exist, they do not need to be equal. This is easily seen by something simple such as $a_n = 2 + (-1)^n$.

2
On

Here's an example to show that the convergence of $A_n$ does not imply the convergence of $G_n$.

Let $\mathbb{N}_0$ denote the set of nonnegative integers, and let $S=\{2^k{\,\mid\,}k\in\mathbb{N}_0\}$.

Let the sequence $x_1,x_2,x_3,...$ be defined by $$ x_n= \begin{cases} {\large{\frac{1}{2^n}}}&\text{if}\;n\in S\\[4pt] 1&\text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ Then the sequence $(x_n)$ is a bounded, non-convergent sequence of positive real numbers.

For $A_n$ we have $$ \frac{n-\bigl(\log_2(n)+1\bigr)}{n} < A_n < 1 $$ hence ${\displaystyle{\lim_{n\to\infty}}}A_n=1$.

For $G_n$ we have $$ G_n = \begin{cases} {\large{\frac{1}{2}}}&\text{if}\;n+1\in S\\[4pt] {\Large{\frac{{\Large{1}}}{2^{\left(2-{\large{\frac{1}{n}}}\right)}}}}&\text{if}\;n\in S\\ \end{cases} $$ hence the sequence $(G_n)$ has limit points ${\large{\frac{1}{2}}}$ and ${\large{\frac{1}{4}}}$, so $(G_n)$ is non-convergent.