Suppose $\mathcal{H}$ is a Hilbert space and the product $T_1T_2 \in B(\mathcal{H})$ is invertible. Does this imply that both $T_1, T_2$ are invertible ? I am unable to prove this since, unlike the finite dimensional case, injectivity or surjectivity alone does not imply invertibility. I am of course assuming that both both $T_1,T_2 \in B(\mathcal{H})$
2026-04-02 12:38:49.1775133529
does invertibility of product imply invertibility of each term of product?
856 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in INVERSE
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Proving whether a matrix is invertible
- Proof verification : Assume $A$ is a $n×m$ matrix, and $B$ is $m×n$. Prove that $AB$, an $n×n$ matrix is not invertible, if $n>m$.
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Show that if $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ are elements of a group then $(a_1\cdots a_n)^{-1} =a_n^{-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}$
- Simplifying $\tan^{-1} {\cot(\frac{-1}4)}$
- Invertible matrix and inverse matrix
- show $f(x)=f^{-1}(x)=x-\ln(e^x-1)$
- Inverse matrix for $M_{kn}=\frac{i^{(k-n)}}{2^n}\sum_{j=0}^{n} (-1)^j \binom{n}{j}(n-2j)^k$
- What is the determinant modulo 2?
Related Questions in PRODUCTS
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Can we give a categorical definition of product without using any sub/superscripts or cheating?
- Is there an "inverted" dot product?
- About constant product
- Finding a closed form for a simple product
- For what value(s) of $a$ does the inequality $\prod_{i=0}^{a}(n-i) \geq a^{a+1}$ hold?
- Is there something like coproduct categories
- Limit of Product of iid Random Variables
- Approximating $\frac{\frac{N}{2}!\frac{N}{2}!}{(\frac{N}{2}-m)!(\frac{N}{2}+m)!}$ without using logs
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No. Let $H$ be a separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, and let $\{e_k\}_{k \in \mathbb{N}}$ be an orthonormal basis. Let $T_1 \in B(H)$ be given by $T_1 e_k = e_{2k}$, and let $T_2 \in B(H)$ be given by $$ T_2 e_k = \begin{cases} e_{k/2} &\text{if $k$ is even,}\\ 0 &\text{if $k$ is odd;} \end{cases} $$ observe, indeed, that $\|T_1\| = \|T_2\| = 1$. Then $T_1$ is injective but not surjective, $T_2$ is surjective but not injective, and yet $T_2 T_1 = \operatorname{id}_H$. The essential point is that $V := \operatorname{span}\{e_{2k}\}_{k \in \mathbb{N}}$ is a proper closed subspace of $H$ even though $V \cong H$ as Hilbert spaces (via $T_1$ as a unitary isomorphism $H \to V$), all of which is ultimately possible precisely because $H$ is infinite-dimensional.