Is not it the case that the cardinality of fractals of dimension 0.00001 should be greater than countable but less than that of continuum?
2026-03-25 20:20:50.1774470050
Does not the existence of fractals with fractional Hausdorff dimension prove that there are cardinalities in between countable and continuum?
135 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FRACTALS
- does the area converge?
- "Mandelbrot sets" for different polynomials
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- Does the boundary of the Mandelbrot set $M$ have empty interior?
- What sort of function is this? (Logistic map?)
- effective degree for normalized escape-time of hybrids
- Julia set of $x_n = \frac{ x_{n-1}^2 - 1}{n}$
- A closed form for the sum $\sum_{s=0}^{n-1} e^{\frac{s(s+1)}{2}i\theta}$?
- Given a real number $d , (1<d<2)$, is there a fractal with fractal dimension $d$?
- How can one write a line element for non-integer dimensions?
Related Questions in DIMENSION-THEORY-ANALYSIS
- Codimension of intersection of zero sets of polynomials.
- How many points define a sphere of unknown radius?
- Some problems related to unirational varieties
- Generate uniformly distributed points in n-dimensional sphere
- Dimension of solutions of EDP
- Does the boundary of the Mandelbrot set $M$ have empty interior?
- A one-dimensional Peano continuum that is not embeddable into $\mathbb{R}^3$
- Embedding preference orders in 2D Euclidean space
- Can a variety "of dimension $\geqslant 1$" be finite?
- Splitting $\mathbb{R}^n$ into two subspaces
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, it does not.
The underlying assumption that dimension correlates strongly with cardinality is false. Indeed, this is one of the earliest results about infinite sets: that (for example) $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$ have the same cardinality despite their different dimensions. Note that fractals don't enter into this at all: right at the outset we see a fundamental difference betwen the "geometric" characteristics of a particular set of points and the cardinality of that set.
As an exercise, it's not hard to construct a bijection between the Koch curve and the unit interval. In fact, on general descriptive-set-theoretic grounds no "reasonably-definable" shape is going to have cardinality strictly between $\aleph_0$ and $2^{\aleph_0}$ (e.g. no continuous image of a Borel set will do this), regardless of whether CH holds. So all the fractals we can actually describe concretely have size continuum.
There is a related question, however, which is more interesting:
It turns out that this is not answerable by ZFC alone. Specifically, if we let $\mathfrak{h}$ be the smallest cardinality of any subset of $\mathbb{R}$ of positive Hausdorff dimension (say), it turns out that:
It is consistent with ZFC that $\mathfrak{h}=2^{\aleph_0}$. (This happens trivially if CH holds, but it's more interestingly also a consequence of the weaker principle MA which allows $2^{\aleph_0}>\aleph_1$.)
It is consistent with ZFC that $\mathfrak{h}<2^{\aleph_0}$. (This requires forcing.)
Meanwhile, ZFC obviously proves that $\aleph_0<\mathfrak{h}\le 2^{\aleph_0}$. Quantities like $\mathfrak{h}$ - reasonably-definable cardinals corresponding to notions of "sufficiently large" which we know are uncountable and at most continuum, but consistently are intermediate - are called cardinal characteristics of the continuum, and their interplay is extremely well-studied (see e.g. here or here).