I believe the isomorphic extension theorem gives a way to "amalgamate" two embeddings $\iota_1:F \rightarrow E$ and $\iota_2: F \rightarrow K$ into embeddings $\iota_3: E \rightarrow \bar{K}$ and $i:K \rightarrow \bar{K}$ that satisfy the amalgamation property with respect to the initial structure $F$, provided $E$ is an algebraic extension of $F$. But I cannot find any literature concerning whether two general (possibly transcendental) field extensions of a field $F$ amalgamate in such a way.
2026-04-23 06:24:26.1776925466
Does the class of fields admit amalgamation?
111 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in MODEL-THEORY
- What is the definition of 'constructible group'?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Existence of indiscernible set in model equivalent to another indiscernible set
- A ring embeds in a field iff every finitely generated sub-ring does it
- Graph with a vertex of infinite degree elementary equiv. with a graph with vertices of arbitrarily large finite degree
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
- Sufficient condition for isomorphism of $L$-structures when $L$ is relational
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, this is possible. Let $A$ and $B$ be transcendence bases of $E$ and $K$ over $F$, respectively. (These could be $\emptyset$ if the extensions are algebraic.) Assume without loss of generality that $|A|\leqslant |B|$, and let $\alpha:A\to B$ be any injection. Now let $F'=\iota_1(F)(A)$. Then $F'$ is naturally a subfield of $E$, and by definition $E$ is an algebraic extension of $F'$; let $\tau_1:F'\hookrightarrow E$ be the inclusion map. We also have a field morphism $\tau_2:F'\to K$, uniquely determined by declaring its action on $\iota_1(F)\subseteq F'$ to be $\iota_2\circ\iota_1^{-1}$ and its action on $A$ to be given by $\alpha$. Now, since $E$ is algebraic over $F'$, by the isomorphism extension theorem there exists a field $L$ and morphisms $\sigma_1:E\to L$ and $\sigma_2:K\to L$ over $F'$, and now precomposing with $\iota_1$ and $\iota_2$ we are done:
$$\require{AMScd} \require{cancel} \def\diagdownarrow#1{\smash{\raise.6em\rlap{\ \ \scriptstyle #1} \lower.6em{\cancelto{}{\Space{2em}{1.7em}{0px}}}}} \begin{CD} E @>\sigma_1>>L\\ @A\tau_1AA @AA\sigma_2A\\ F' @>\tau_2>> K\\ @A\iota_1AA \diagdownarrow{\iota_2} \\ F \end{CD}$$ The idea here is that we have replaced a question about the possibly non-algebraic extension $E:F$ with one about an algebraic extension $E:F'$, while not including any new elements in $F'$ that are algebraic over $F$ (and thus ensuring that we still have a morphism $F'\to K$ over $F$). This is made possible for field extensions by the machinery of transcendence bases, and it generalizes very nicely to broader contexts via the Noether normalization lemma.