On many fractal explorer programs, after a certain level of zoom, the shapes begin to become smoother, as is shown. Is this a rounding error or an actual representation of the computation?
2026-02-23 18:04:15.1771869855
Does the Mandelbrot set get smoother because of a rounding error
782 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FRACTALS
- does the area converge?
- "Mandelbrot sets" for different polynomials
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- Does the boundary of the Mandelbrot set $M$ have empty interior?
- What sort of function is this? (Logistic map?)
- effective degree for normalized escape-time of hybrids
- Julia set of $x_n = \frac{ x_{n-1}^2 - 1}{n}$
- A closed form for the sum $\sum_{s=0}^{n-1} e^{\frac{s(s+1)}{2}i\theta}$?
- Given a real number $d , (1<d<2)$, is there a fractal with fractal dimension $d$?
- How can one write a line element for non-integer dimensions?
Related Questions in COMPLEX-DYNAMICS
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- effective degree for normalized escape-time of hybrids
- Julia set of $x_n = \frac{ x_{n-1}^2 - 1}{n}$
- Is this proof of Milnor's lemma valid? the one about Newtons method and super-attractive fixed-points corresponding to simple roots
- Hausdorff Dimension of Julia set of $z^2+2$?
- How to find the set of $c$ for which the Julia set of $x^2+c$ completely lies in $\mathbb{R}$?
- Iteration of mapping with nested iterates in logarithm
- Help understanding a proof on why the Mandelbrot set is fractal
- bounds on dimension of Julia sets inside Mandelbrot set
- How does this algorithm get the limit set of "kissing" Schottky group?
Related Questions in ROUNDING-ERROR
- Rounding down values taken from an exponential distribution
- Rounding fractions with less digits
- The error when we rounding down and sum in $\sum_i \lfloor n/i \rfloor$ vs. $\sum_i n/i$.
- How do I fight loss of significance and/or improve convergence for this recursive algorithm?
- Chopping a number
- Find an alternative expression for $y :=cos(x+\delta)-cos(x)$
- Maclaurin polynomial error bounds
- Error bound for floating-point interval dot product
- rounding up to two decimal points
- What are methods for correction of experimental measurements?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The closer a point is to the boundary of the Mandelbrot set, the more iterations it takes to determine whether the forward orbit of that point remains bounded--i.e., whether the point is inside the set or outside. Since the forward orbit of a point that is inside the set always remains bounded, and some of these are nonperiodic, it is in general not possible to prove that an arbitrary point is inside the set with a finite number of numeric iterations.
Since most algorithms to visualize the Mandelbrot set employ some preset maximum number of iterations, the lower this maximum, the more error is present near the boundary of the set. The algorithm fails to detect that these points that are actually outside the set have an orbit that eventually escapes, because the maximum number of iterations are reached, at which point the algorithm assumes the point is inside the set. Increasing the maximum number of iterations increases the accuracy near the boundary, but at the expense of increasing computational time.
Sophisticated algorithms exploit periodicity of bounded orbits of points inside the set to reduce the computational cost of high iterations, but as I have stated, some points inside the set have nonperiodic orbits. Also, periodicity detection is itself not free.
To be clear, the phenomenon you are showing in the picture is not due to rounding error. It is error due to the algorithm using a finite maximum number of iterations to determine whether a point is inside or outside the set, and this maximum number selected is insufficient for the magnification of the image. The higher the magnification, the larger this maximum needs to be.