Does the tutor's proof make sense? If not, how would you prove this?

119 Views Asked by At

I'm taking an online course in Discrete Maths. The course starts by explaining the need for proofs, by presenting a proof to an example problem. The way the tutor presents the proof does not make sense to me. Can anyone explain, and if not, can you provide a better proof?

The problem:

Find a number such that, after removing the first digit, it becomes the original number divided by 57

The tutor gives one solution as 7125. And then starts the proof like this:

If we think of $b...z$ to be the remaining sequence of $k$ digits (after removing the first one) we can use $x$ to represent it, like this:

$ x = b...z$

And lets call the first digit which we removed, $a$. The digit $a$ is a value $0 \lt a \le 9$, and in the original number, it has been "shifted left" by $k$ places, i.e. it is that single digit multiplied by $10 ^ k$.

And the tutor goes through the following 3 steps:

$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,a \times 10^k + x = 57 \times x $

$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,a \times 10^k =\,\,\,\, 56 \times x \,\,\,\,= \,\,\,\,\, 7 \times 8 \times x $

$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,a \times (2^k \times 5^k) = 7 \times 8 \times x$

I understand it so far, but then the tutor states "here 7 cannot hide", while circling the expression $(2^k \times 5^k)$. I've taken "cannot hide" to mean 7 is obviously never a factor of. Is that correct? And if so, how can you tell this simply by glancing at the expression?

Anyway, the tutor then concludes therefore that $a$ "must be divisible by 7", and because $a$ is a single digit, makes the following step:

$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,7 \times (2^k \times 5^k) = 7 \times 8 \times x$

$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,10^k = 8 \times x$

So, going back to his solution 7125: $x$ is 125, and therefore $k$ is 3 (3 digits long), and it is true that 125 = 1000 $\div$ 8. Thus proving that $a$ is indeed 7.

But how did he make that leap about 7 not being a factor of $(2^k \times 5^k)$?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

As said in the other comments and answers the reason why $2^k \cdot 5^k$ is not divisible by $7$ if the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. (If a number is divisible by $7$ it has $7$ as one of its prime factors, but the prime factors of $2^k \cdot 5^k$ are only $2$ and $5$)

The proof shows that the first digit of the number has to be $7$, so you are left with $$ 2^k \cdot 5^k=8 x \rightarrow \frac{2^k \cdot 5^k}{8}=x $$ you know that the LHS has to be divisible by $8=2^3$ (because $x$ is an integer), so you have $k \ge 3$. This means that the smallest numbers that satisfies your theorem is $7125$, but you can choose $k$ bigger than $3$ and still obtain a valid result. In particular, because your number can be written as $$ 7 \cdot 10^k +x=\left(7+\frac{1}{8} \right) \cdot 10^k $$ and $\left(7+\frac{1}{8} \right) \cdot 10^3=7125$ if you choose $k>3$ your number becames $7125 \cdot 10^{k-3}$

3
On

Since the term a has been shifted by k terms to the left, k must be a positive integral value. That being said, $(2^k \times 5^k)$ can never form a term that is a multiple of 7, and hence a must be a multiple of 7.

Since we originally considered a to lie in the range (0,9]; 7 is the only possible value of a. Since we had a term of $2^k$ in our expression, that must be equal to 8 , giving k=3 and hence the number taken as 7125.

Hope this helps.