Suppose you have a variety of coloured marbles, $n_1$ of colour one, $n_2$ of colour two, up to $n_k$ of colour $k$, for a total of $n=n_1+\dotsb+n_k$ marbles. Suppose if you draw marble $i$ you get a payout of $v_i$ (positive or negative). You draw $j$ marbles. Find the expected payout. You can go through the definition and sum probability of a particular draw ($x$) value of that draw. Intuitively, the answer should be sum (vi)(ni/n)(j). Is this true and how do you prove it?
2026-05-04 20:07:14.1777925234
Drawing marbles from urns and expected values
305 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in COMBINATORICS
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Hard combinatorial identity: $\sum_{l=0}^p(-1)^l\binom{2l}{l}\binom{k}{p-l}\binom{2k+2l-2p}{k+l-p}^{-1}=4^p\binom{k-1}{p}\binom{2k}{k}^{-1}$
- Algebraic step including finite sum and binomial coefficient
- nth letter of lexicographically ordered substrings
- Count of possible money splits
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- A certain partition of 28
- Counting argument proof or inductive proof of $F_1 {n \choose1}+...+F_n {n \choose n} = F_{2n}$ where $F_i$ are Fibonacci
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Assuming the payoff $v_i$ depends solely on the colour of the drawn marble and this is fixed we see that the expected payoff for the value of the first draw is $$\sum_{i=1}^k \frac{n_i}{n} v_i$$
Now if all the draws are with replacement it is trivial to prove that we can simply multiply the above answer by the amount of draws done, since they are independent.
If we are sampling without replacement we are essentially looking at the hypergeometric distribution for each colour. Noet that for a hypergeometric distribution the probability of drawing that colour does not change based over the amount of marbles drown. So the probability of drawing a marble of colour $i$ on the first draw is the same as for the fifth marble.
Therefore we once again achieve the same result by seeing that the probability stays at $\frac{n_i}{n}$ for each draw and by linearity the same result comes out as when we are replacing the marbles! (only assumption is that the amount of draws is less or equal than the total amount of marbles in the urn).
I hope this helps you to form a basis on which you can derive the proof yourself. I have intentionally not given you the full proof.