Let $(\Omega , \mathcal{A} , P)$ be a measure space of probability and let $X : (\Omega , \mathcal{A}) \to (\mathbb{R} , {\mathcal{B}}_{\mathbb{R}})$ be a random variable (${\mathcal{B}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ denotes the Borel $\sigma$-algebra on $\mathbb{R}$). By definition, \begin{equation} E(g(X)) = \int_{\Omega} (g \circ X) \, d P \end{equation} if $g : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is a Borel-measurable function, and I also have been that \begin{equation} E(g(X)) = \int_{\mathbb{R}} g \, d P_X\mbox{,} \end{equation} where $P_X = P \circ X^{- 1} : {\mathcal{B}}_{\mathbb{R}} \to [0 , 1]$ is the probability induced by $X$, so I we can obtain that \begin{equation} \int_{\Omega} (g \circ X) \, d P = \int_{\mathbb{R}} g \, d P_X\mbox{.} \tag{1} \end{equation} How can I show that? On the other hand, I have studied measure theory and I know the next statement: if $f , g : \Omega \to [0 , \infty)$ are two measurable functions and we consider ${\nu}_f : \mathcal{A} \to [0 , \infty)$, given by \begin{equation} {\nu}_f(A) = \int_A f \, d P \end{equation} for all $A \in \mathcal{A}$, then ${\nu}_f$ is a measure on $(\Omega , \mathcal{A})$ and \begin{equation} \int_{\Omega} g \, d {\nu}_f = \int_{\Omega} (f g) \, d P\mbox{,} \end{equation} but I think that I can't use this to prove $(1)$. Can you help me please? Thank you very much in advance.
2026-04-12 08:21:32.1775982092
Equality between two integrals
50 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As often fruitful in integration theories, start with indicator/step functions, then try to pass to the limit. Your construction of the probability measure $P_X$ on $(\mathbb R,\mathcal B_{\mathbb R})$ is $$ A\mapsto P_X(A):= A\mapsto \int_\Omega1_A(X(\omega))P(d\omega),\quad \text{where }A\in\mathcal B_{\mathbb R}.$$ Now take the indicator function $g=1_A$. Then $$ \int_{\mathbb R}g(y)d P_X(dy)=P_X(A)=\int_\Omega1_A(X(\omega))P(d\omega)=\int_\Omega g\circ X (\omega)P(d\omega).$$ Show the identity for linear combination of indicator functions, then show the result taking limits for an appropriate class of Borel-measurable functions $g$ (do you need some other condition to pass to the limit?).