For a quadratic Bezier Curve defined by points $A, B, C$, with point $M$ on the curve interpolated by $i$,
When points $A, M, C$ and angle $\alpha$ are given, $i$ and $B$ are:
$$i^2 = \frac{(y_A-y_M)\sin\alpha-(x_A-x_M)\cos\alpha}{(y_A-y_C)\sin\alpha-(x_A-x_C)\cos\alpha}$$ $$x_B=\frac{x_A(1-i)^2+x_Ci^2-x_M}{2i(i-1)}$$ $$y_B=\frac{y_A(1-i)^2+y_Ci^2-y_M}{2i(i-1)}$$
for a full working out: $$x_D = x_A+i(x_B-x_A)$$ $$x_E = x_B+i(x_C-x_B)$$ $$x_M = x_D+i(x_E-x_D)$$
$$x_M = x_A(1-i)^2+2ix_B(1-i)+i^2x_C$$ $$x_B=\frac{x_A(1-i)^2+i^2x_C-x_M}{-2i(1-i)} = AB\sin\alpha+x_A$$ $$y_B=\frac{y_A(1-i)^2+i^2y_C-y_M}{-2i(1-i)} = AB\cos\alpha+y_A$$ $$AB = \frac{i^2(x_A-x_C)+x_A-x_M}{2i\sin\alpha(1-i)}= \frac{i^2(y_A-y_C)+y_A-y_M}{2i\cos\alpha(1-i)}$$
hence resulting the above 3 equations.
Now consider a cubic Bezier curve defined by points $A, B, C, D$
$1)$With given points $A, D$, $M$ interpolated by $i$,angles $\alpha, \beta$, Can $B, C$ and $i$ be derived?
$2)$ if not, With given points $A, D$, $M$ (interpolated by $i$), $N$ (interpolated by $j$), angles $\alpha, \beta$, What are the equations for $B, C$, $i$ and $j$?


Question 1: The answer is no.
Here is a counterexample
where with the same angles $\alpha$ and $\beta$, with given extreme points $A,D$ and current point $M$, it is possible to have different values for $i$ and different points $B$ and $C$.
I have taken $A(0,0), D(1,0)$,
($B(0,1), C=(0.8,0.6)$ for the red curve),
($B'(0,0.2), C'(0.6,1.2)$ for the blue curve).
In fact any other barycentric combination $(1-t) C_1 + t C_2$ of these curves, like the curve in black, will be a cubic Bezier solution of your issue.
Edit: We have seen that several solutions are possible, but we haven't shown how it is possible to obtain a solution. We are going to do it in the particular case where $BC$ is parallel to $AB$.
First of all, instead of refering to angles $\alpha, \beta$, I prefer to refer to triangle $ADE$, where $E$ is the intersection point of the rays issued from $A$ and $D$.
The key point is to compute the barycentric coordinates of $M$ with respect to triangle $ADE$,
$$M=uA+vD+wE\tag{*}$$
in two ways
$$u=\dfrac{[MDE]}{[ADE]}, \ \ v=\dfrac{[AME]}{[ADE]}, \ \ w=\dfrac{[ADM]}{[ADE]}$$
$$\begin{cases}B&=&kE+(1-k)A\\C&=&kE+(1-k)D \end{cases}$$
Plugging these relationships into the defining relationship:
$$M=(1-t)^3A+3(1-t)^2tB+3(1-t)t^2C+t^3D$$
will give a relationship:
$$M=\underbrace{[(1-t)^3+3(1-t)^2t(k-1)]}_{u'}A+[v']D+[w']E\tag{**}$$
It remains to identify (*) and (**) giving two equations in the two unknowns $t$ and $k$ that remains to be solved in order to get a value of $t$ and a value of $k$, the latter giving the positions of $B$ and $C$.
I have verified that it works but I don't want to expose rather tedious computations...