I don't know how to do this particular thing.
Using quantifiers and logical links as
$$and, or, =>, <=>$$
and expressions like $$x\in A, x\notin A, R(x, y), \lnot R(x, y)$$
Make formula saying that R is not an equivalence relation on set A.
I don't know how to do this particular thing.
Using quantifiers and logical links as
$$and, or, =>, <=>$$
and expressions like $$x\in A, x\notin A, R(x, y), \lnot R(x, y)$$
Make formula saying that R is not an equivalence relation on set A.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Hint:
Recall the definition of an equivalence relation $R$ on a set $A$. $R$ will be a subset of $A \times A$. It also satisfies three properties:
Begin by defining a subset $R \subseteq A \times A$ and translate the necessary properties into propositional logic and it should, within reason, all come together pretty smoothly, at least insofar as being an equivalence relation.
To be not an equivalence relation, one or more of the above properties must be false.