Equivalent definitions of Fréchet differentiability

193 Views Asked by At

In their book The Ricci Flow in Riemannian Geometry Andrews and Hopper have an appendix on Gâteaux and Fréchet differentiability.

They define Gâteaux differentiability as follows:

Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces. A function $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is said to be Gâteaux differentiable at $x$ if there exists a bounded linear operator $T_x \in L(X,Y)$ such that for all $v \in X$, $$\lim_{t \to 0} \frac{f(x+tv)-f(x)}{t} = T_x v.$$ The operator $T_x$ is called the Gâteaux derivative.

This is the definition I was presented with in class. Fréchet differentiability, however, is defined differently than in class (In class we used the second definition mentioned in the following passage):

If the limit (in the sense of the Gâteaux derivative) exists uniformly in $v$ on the unit sphere of X, we say $f$ is Fréchet differentiable at $x$ and $T_x$ is the Fréchet derivative of $f$ at $x$. Equivalently, if we set $y=tv$ then $t \rightarrow 0$ if and only if $y \rightarrow 0$. Thus $f$ is Fréchet differentiable at $x$ if for all $y$, $$f(x+y)-f(x)-T_x(y)=o(\|y\|).$$

Questions

  • What does "the limit exists uniformly in $v$ on the unit sphere of X" mean exactly? I know what uniform convergence is in regards to a sequence of functions. However, I cannot figure out how this concept relates to the one presented here, i.e. what sequence of functions is considered here?
  • How are the two presented definitions of Fréchet differentiability equivalent?