I understand the concept of standard deviations and z-values, but I'm trying to figure out if standard deviations alone are good for establishing the upper and lower bounds for normal. For example, if I have the following dataset:
$x = 1,4,1,10,112,6,22,7,18,113,1,4,1,10,112,6,22,7,18,113,1,4,1,10,112,6,22,7$
$\mu = 26.82$
$std(x) = 41.16$
I have been establishing the range for normal values like this:
$lowerNormal = 26.82 - 41.16 = -14.78$
$upperNormal = 26.82 + 41.16 = 67.98$
So, when a new value comes along:
$a = 72$
I consider that value to be abnormal, since it is above the $upperNormal$ value.
My question is whether or not this is a statistically sound way for determining whether a value is normal. The real issue I'm seeing is that none of the values in $x$ will ever be negative, so it seems that at least the lower bound is somewhat arbitrary.
Anyways, I apologize if I am missing something simple. I'm learning statistics on my own and it's a little puzzling sometimes. Thanks for your help
I believe above is set of random number. Standard deviation is appropriate for the numbers which are dependent such as daily road traffic. Please also consider Correlation for less dependent numbers.