I'm attempting to teach myself topology for graduate school this summer, but I'm having a tough time. I'm trying to prove that the Euclidean topology on $\mathbb{R}^{m+n}$ is equivalent to the product topology on $\mathbb{R}^m \times \mathbb{R}^n$. I realize to do this that I should make a homeomorphism between them, and the identity function would work for this, but I'm unsure on what to do from there.
Here's what I have so far: Let $x \in U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{m+n}$ be some open set in $\mathbb{R}^{m+n}$, then there exists an open ball $B_{\epsilon}(x) \subseteq U$. But I'm not sure where to go from there.
I have read this Product topology and standard euclidean topology over $\mathbb{R}^n$ are equivalent but I do not understand why you are allowed to assume that each of the subsets in $B^1_{\epsilon}(x_i)$ are open in $\mathbb{R}$. thank you
Hint Suppose $\lVert \cdot \rVert_1$ and $\lVert \cdot \rVert_2$ are the Euclidean norms in $ \Bbb R^n,\Bbb R^m$ respectively. Then $\lVert (x,y)\rVert = (\lVert x\rVert_1^2+\lVert y\rVert_2^2)^{1/2}$ is the Euclidean norm in $\Bbb R^n\times\Bbb R^m$.