Let $(X,\leq)$ be a preorder, i.e. $\leq$ is a reflexive and transitive binary relation on $X$. I want to show that $\leq$ induces a topological structure on $X$. Hence I need to specify when a subset $A$ of $X$ must be considered open. My personal guess is that $A$ is open iff it is contained in its interior, where the interior $A^°$ of $A$ is defined as follows:
$$A^°:=\{s\in X: \forall f\in X (s\leq f\rightarrow f\in A\}$$
Do you think this makes sense? If not, which could be the right definition of an open?
A "dual" definition for the interior of $A$ could be
$$A^°:=\{s\in X: \forall p\in X (p\leq s\rightarrow p\in A\}$$
Do the two definitions work in order to get a topological space? Do they define the same topology on $X$ (if they define any?)
In the same spirit, we could define a topology by mean of closed subsets. I say that a subset $C$ of $X$ is closed when the closure of $C$ is contained in $C$, and i define the closure of $\overline{C}$ of $C$ as follows: $$\overline{C}:=\{s\in X:\exists f\in X(s\leq f\wedge f\in C\}$$ or, dually, as $$\overline{C}:=\{s\in X: \exists p\in X(p\leq s\wedge p\in C\}$$ The question is the same: do this define a topology on $X$? If so, what kind of topology is this? Has it some evident description, is it the obviuous one, or natural in some sense?
If you have a simple order, then the following approach by Munkres is a nice one:
The following will be the basis elements of the topology, and the generate the topology using this basis.
It is easily seen that this forms a basis of a topology.
This is one way to define a topology on an ordered set. For example, the usual topology on $\mathbb{R}$ is the one obtained by this method.