I am working on the proof that each presheaf $F\in \mathbf{Set}^{\mathcal C^{op}}$ is the colimit of $\mathbf{y}\circ \pi\colon \int_{\mathcal{C}}F\to \mathbf{Set}^{\mathcal C^{op}}$ where $\int_{\mathcal{C}}F$ is the category of elements of $F$, $\pi\colon (x,C)\mapsto C$ is the natural projection and $\mathbf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding. In the course of the proof, I showed there was an embedding of $\int_{\mathcal C}F$ into the slice category $\mathbf{Set}^{\mathcal C^{op}}/F$ to obtain a cocone with vertex $F$. Then using the Yoneda lemma, for any other cocone $(p_x\colon \mathbf{y}C\to P)_{(x,C)}$ under $\mathbf{y}\circ \pi$, I constructed the natural transformation $\alpha$ componentwise, using the Yoneda lemma. However, I cannot for the life of me see where I needed the arrows of $\int_{\mathcal{C}}F$ in the proof. I see how the cocone is compatible with the arrows, but can't see how they are not extraneous to the proof.
So my question boils down to: Can someone provide a counterexample of a presheaf $F$ that is not a colimit of the functor $\mathbf{y}\circ\pi$ where the domain is the discretization of the category of elements of $F$, i.e., forgetting the nontrivial arrows?
There is a conceptual proof which goes along these lines: