I was reading this expository paper by Yves André in which he states a nice result: every transcendental number is the root of a power series over $\mathbb Q$. He accredits this theorem to Hurwitz in paragraph 2.3, but doesn't give a reference for it. I haven't been able to find the relevant paper (or another exposition of te proof) myself, so I'm hoping someone here knows where to look!
2026-03-25 13:55:25.1774446925
Every transcendental number satisfies a power series
261 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in TRANSCENDENTAL-NUMBERS
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible to express $\pi$ as $a^b$ for $a$ and $b$ non-transcendental numbers?
- Is it true that evaluating a polynomial with integer coefficients at $e$, uniquely defines it?
- Is $\frac{5\pi}{6}$ a transcendental or an algebraic number?
- Is there any intermediate fields between these two fields?
- Is there any pair of positive integers $ (x,n)$ for which :$e^{{e}^{{e}^{\cdots x}}}=2^{n}$?
- Why is :$\displaystyle {e}^\sqrt{2}$ is known to be transcedental number but ${\sqrt{2}}^ {e}$ is not known?
- Irrationality of $\int_{-a}^ax^nn^xd x$
- Proving that $ 7<\frac{5\phi e}{\pi}< 7.0000689$ where $\phi$ is the Golden Ratio
- Transcendence of algebraic numbers with Transcendental power
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Edit: There's a straightforward proof below for the result exactly as mentioned in the OP. However, the paper linked to cites a stronger result, specifying that the power series should define an entire function of exponential growth. I don't see how the argument below gives that; see Comments at the bottom.
Say $\alpha\in\Bbb C$, $\alpha\ne0$.
First, if $\alpha$ is real it's trivial that it's a zero of some power series with rational coefficients: If $r_0,\dots,r_n\in\Bbb Q$ have been chosen, there exists $r_{n+1}\in\Bbb Q$ with $$|r_0+\dots+r_{n+1}\alpha^{n+1}|<1/n;$$hence $$r_0+r_1\alpha+\dots=0.$$
Now say $\alpha=\rho e^{it}$, $\rho>0$, $t\in\Bbb R$. If $t/\pi$ is rational then there exists a positive integer $N$ so that $\beta=\alpha^N\in\Bbb R$; so $\beta$ is a root of some rational power series, hence so is $\alpha$.
Finally, suppose $t/\pi$ is irrational. Then $\{e^{ikt}:k=1,2\dots\}$ is dense in the unit circle. Hence for every $n$ the set $\{r\alpha^k:r\in\Bbb Q, k=n+1,n+2,\dots\}$ is dense in $\Bbb C$ (to approximate $z$ by $r\alpha^k$, first choose $k$ so as to get the argument approximately right, then choose $r$ to fix up the modulus). So as above we can recursively construct a sequence $r_j$ of rationals and a strictly increasing sequence $n_j$ of positive integers so that $$\sum r_j\alpha^{n_j}=0.$$
Comments. Now what about getting an entire function of exponential growth?
If $\alpha$ is real this is no problem: Say wlog $\alpha>1$ to keep the inequalities clean and replace the main inequality above by $$|r_0+\dots+r_{n+1}\alpha^{n+1}|<1/(n+2)!;$$it follows that $r_n=O(1/n!)$, hence the power series is an entire function of exponential growth.
And so we're done if $\alpha^N$ is real. But the case $t/\pi$ irrational is not so simple, as far as I can see. We can make $\left|\sum_{j=0}^k r_j\alpha^{n_j}\right|$ as small as we want as a function of $k$, but the doesn't help; saying for example $$\left|\sum_{j=0}^k r_j\alpha^{n_j}\right|\le1/k!!!$$ says nothing about the radius of convergence. The problem is that in order to make $\left|\sum_{j=0}^k r_j\alpha^{n_j}\right|$ small, by the trivial argument above, we may be forced to take $n_k$ large, so we don't get anything analogous to$$\left|\sum_{j=0}^k r_j\alpha^{n_j}\right|\le1/(n_k)!,$$which is what we need.
Well, the paper cited in the OP calls this an elementary result, so it can't be that hard. Probably there's a simple proof that's nothing like what above; the argument above is after all a simple brute-force sort of thing, surely one can do something more subtle?
Perhaps one can fix the argument above, showing that you don't need to take $n_k$ too large to make $\left|\sum_{j=0}^k r_j\alpha^{n_j}\right|$ small.
Or something I just thought of. The proof that the sum of two algebraic numbers is algebraic is fairly simple if you look at it right, but it's not a priori obvious. Maybe some extension of that argument shows that if $\alpha=x+iy$ then the existence of suitable power series for $x$ and for $y$, proved above, implies the same for $\alpha$?