Is there any intermediate fields between these two fields?

131 Views Asked by At

Is there any intermediate fields between the algebraic closure of the rational field and the complex field?
Can I get such a field by adding a transcendental number and then taking the algebraic closure over the complex field?
If so,how can I prove it?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

5
On

Hint: what is the cardinality of the algebraic closure of the rationals? And therefore, what is the cardinality of an extension of this field by a sinlge transcendental element? And the cardinality of the algebraic closure of the new obtained field?

On the other hand, what is the cardiniality of the complex numbers?

9
On

Yes, of course there are such fields.

Let $L = \overline ℚ ⊆ ℂ$ be the algebraic closure of $ℚ$ within $ℂ$. Then $L$ is algebraically closed and algebraic over $ℚ$. For any transcendental number $α ∈ ℂ$, the algebraic closure $L_α = \overline ℚ(α) ⊆ ℂ$ within $ℂ$ of $ℚ(α)$ is an algebraically closed field with $ℚ ⊆ L_α$. So $L ⊆ L_α$. Since $α$ is transcendental $α \notin L$, so the inclusion is strict.

You can do this construction with every subset $A ⊆ ℂ$ instead of just some $α ∈ ℂ$. Whenever $A$ contains transcendental elements, you end up with a proper field extension $L_A$ of $L = \overline ℚ$. In fact, you can get every algebraically closed intermediate extension $E / L$ this way, because you may take $A = E$, so $L_E = E$. However, there might be extensions $E / L$ that are not algebraically closed …

However, you can’t get all intermediate extensions by only doing this with single elements $α$ (or even finite or countable sets $A ⊆ ℂ$), as pointed out / hinted at by Pedro.

An alternative way to see that $L_α ≠ ℂ$ is to consider algebraically independent elements. Say, if $α, β ∈ ℂ$ are algebraically independent over $ℚ$, then $β \notin L_α$.