I'm trying to find the exact solution to the equation $x+x^x=3$. I know the answer is approximately 1.4, but what is its formal definition? I understand it may not be from the result of a real function, since the exact solution to its brother, $x^x=3$, requires use of the Lambert W function for its formal definition ($x=e^{W(\ln 3)} $), which cannot be expressed in elementary terms. I have tried looking this equation up on Wolfram alpha but it can only approximate $x$. What would be the exact definition of this variable?
2026-04-02 13:58:06.1775138286
exact solution to $x+x^x=3$
184 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LAMBERT-W
- Intersection points of $2^x$ and $x^2$
- Solving tetration equation with Lambert W Function
- Solving $x \log(x)$ = $100$.
- Is $x=i²$ the solution of this equation $2018^x+2018x+2018=0 $ in $\mathbb{C}$?
- How to solve $x3^x=18$ algebraically
- ideas on how to prove this statement about the Gram points?
- Solving $n/\ln (n) = 990,000$
- Lambert W function: limits and inverse relation
- Solve $a^x = 1-x$
- Prove that $-\gamma x^2 ( x^{k/\gamma}-1 ) -x^2 + \alpha x - \alpha + 1 \leq 0$ for every $2 \leq x \leq n-1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Irrational numbers are usually defined as solutions of equations, for example $x^2=2$, as limits, say $\sum_{k=0}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{4}{2k+1}$ or $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})^{1/n}$, or by introducing new notation, say $\sqrt{2},\pi$ or $e$. You stated the definition as a solution of an equation. Since introducing new notation is not helpful in this case, I only propose the following two alternatives. Let $x^*\in(0,\infty)$ be the solution of $x+x^x=3$.
These would be three common ways (equation, limit, function value) to formally define the number $x^*$. I hope this helps!