Can anyone explain me why $k(x)=k[T_1,\ldots,T_n]/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha$?
2026-04-08 05:49:27.1775627367
Example 3.32 - Algebraic Geometry and Atithmetic Curves, of Qing Liu
189 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

The residue field at a point $x\in X$ is by definition $$ k(x) := \mathcal{O}_{X,x}/\mathfrak{m}_x, $$ where $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ is the stalk of the structure sheaf of $X$ at $x$, and $\mathfrak{m}_x$ is its maximal ideal. If you choose an affine open $\operatorname{Spec} A\subseteq X$ containing $x$, then $k(x)$ may be computed in the following way: the point $x$ corresponds to a prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}\subseteq A$, and we have $$ \mathcal{O}_{X,x} \cong\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{Spec}A,\mathfrak{p}}\cong A_\mathfrak{p}, $$ where $A_\mathfrak{p}$ is the localization of $A$ at $\mathfrak{p}$. This has maximal ideal $\mathfrak{p}A_\mathfrak{p}$.
In your case, $X$ is already affine, so we can take all of $X$ to be the affine open $\operatorname{Spec}A$ containing $x$. Now, $x$ is the point in $X$ corresponding to the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}_\alpha = (T_1 - \alpha_1,\dots, T_n - \alpha_n)$, so we have $$ k(x) = \mathcal{O}_{X,x}/\mathfrak{m}_x\cong \left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/I\right)_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha\left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/I\right)_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}. $$ Localization commutes with taking quotients, so we have \begin{align*} k(x) &\cong \left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/I\right)_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha\left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/I\right)_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}\\ &\cong \left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}/I_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}\right)/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha\left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}/I_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}\right)\\ &\cong k[T_1,\dots, T_n]_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha k[T_1,\dots, T_n]_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}\qquad\textrm{(3rd ring isomorphism theorem)}\\ &\cong \left(k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha k[T_1,\dots, T_n]\right)_{\mathfrak{m}_\alpha}\\ &\cong k[T_1,\dots, T_n]/\mathfrak{m}_\alpha\cong k. \end{align*}