I'm self-studying from the book Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbott, and I don't understand example 4.2.2 on page 105.
The aim of the example is to show that: $$ \lim_{x \to 2} g(x) = 4 $$ where $g(x) = x^2$.
The author starts by writing: $$ |g(x) - 4| = |x^2 - 4 | = |x+2||x-2| $$ which I understand. But then the following paragraph makes no sense to me:
We can make $|x-2|$ as small as we like, but we need an upper bound on $|x+2|$ in order to know how small to choose $\delta$. The presence of the variable $x$ causes some initial confusion, but keep in mind that we are discussing the limit as $x$ approaches $2$. If we agree that our $\delta$-neighborhood around $c = 2$ must have radius no bigger than $\delta = 1$, then we get the upper bound $|x + 2| \leq |3 + 2| = 5$ for all $x \in V_\delta(c)$.
By saying we are only considering the $\delta$-neighborhood around $c=2$ with a radius smaller than or equal to $1$, I would think we get: $$ V_\delta (c) = \{ x \in \mathbb{R} \mid |x-2| < 1 \} = (1,3) $$ so I don't understand where "$|x + 2| \leq |3 + 2| = 5$ for all $x \in V_\delta(c)$" comes from? Any help is much appreciated.
I like using the triangle inequality here instead: $$ |x + 2| = |(x - 2) + (4)| \leq |x - 2| + |4| < 1 + |4| = 5 $$