This is "problem" 6 in Sheldon Axler's Precalculus book, page $6$ chapter $0$. I do not quite understand how I could solve a question like this in a precalculus course. I'm usually just given a bunch of exercises questions. So my answer was the following:
Suppose $\sqrt 2$ is an irrational number and $0$ is a rational number. Because $$\sqrt 2 = \sqrt 2 + 0 $$ the sum of an irrational number and a rational number is an irrational number.
Is this correct?
If you have two rational numbers, their difference (one minus the other) must also be rational. This can be proved easily by reduction to the definition of rationality, since a difference between two ratios of integers can always be written as a single ratio of integers. From this, it follows that it is impossible to get a rational number as the sum of a rational and an irrational; if this were possible, you could re-arrange this to get an irrational as the difference between two rationals.
Theorem: If $r$ is rational and $z+r$ is rational then $z$ must be rational.
Proof: Since $r$ is rational, this means there are integers $a$ and $b \neq 0$ such that $r = a/b$. Since $z+r$ is also rational, this means there are integers $c$ and $d \neq 0$ such that $z+r = c/d$. Hence, we have:
$$z = z+r - r = \frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad-bc}{bd}.$$
Since $a,b,c,d$ are all integers (and $b \neq 0$, $d \neq 0$), the numerator $ad-bc$ is an integer, and the denominator $bd \neq 0$ is a non-zero integer. Hence, $z$ can be written as a ratio of integers, and so $z$ is rational. $\blacksquare$
Corollary: If $z$ is irrational and $r$ is rational then $z+r$ is irrational.
Proof: Follows trivially from the above theorem using a proof-by-contradiction. $\blacksquare$