I'm fairly new to abstract algebra and in an exercise I was asked under which conditions it is true that $(ab)^n = a^nb^n$, for $a,b \in R$ and $n$ a positive integer, where $R$ is a ring. It can be easily shown that the statement holds if $R$ is commutative but I am stuck on the reverse implication. I have shown that if $R$ contains no zero divisors then the statement implies commutativity. Indeed, taking $n = 2$ $$(ab)^2 = abab = a^2b^2 \Leftrightarrow a(ba-ab)b = 0 \Leftrightarrow ba = ab$$ Does there exist non-commutative rings with zero divisors such that $(ab)^n =a^nb^n$ or is this property equivalent to commutativity?
2026-03-25 13:59:05.1774447145
Exponentiation in Non-Commutative Rings
128 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in NONCOMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- In a left noetherian ring, does having a left inverse for an element guarantee the existence of right inverse for that element?
- Are there rational coefficients that hold such properties?
- A characterization for minimal left ideals of semisimple rings
- $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$, with $A$ and $C$ simple rings, but $B$ is not a simple ring
- Simplicity of Noetherian $B$, $A \subseteq B\subseteq C$, where $A$ and $C$ are simple Noetherian domains
- Completion of localization equals the completion
- Representations of an algebra
- A characterization of semisimple module related to anihilators
- Counterexample request: a surjective endomorphism of a finite module which is not injective
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Hagen von Eitzen gave a noncommutative nonunital ring with this property in the comments. However if your ring has a unit, this is impossible.
The proof below is a mess of algebra, so let me briefly explain the idea.
The problem is that the equalities we are given are homogeneous equations of degree at least $4$, like $abab=a^2b^2$, and we want a homogeneous equation of degree 2, $ab=ba$. Thus we need to somehow dehomogenify these equations, which we can do by substituting $a=1+a$ or $b=1+b$ and seeing what we get. This is the idea of the proof below.
Edit:
I will leave my original proof below, but darij grinberg suggested an excellent way to simplify the calculations by phrasing things in terms of commutators in the comments below.
Observe that the condition $abab=a^2b^2$ for all $a$ and $b$ is the same as saying $$a[a,b]b=0$$ for all $a$ and $b$. Now note that substituting $1+a$ in for $a$ gives $$(a+1)[a+1,b]b=(a+1)[a,b]b=0,$$ since $[1,b]=0$. Similarly, we also get $$a[a,b](b+1)=0\text{, and }(a+1)[a,b](b+1)=0.$$ Now add the first and fourth equations and subtract the middle two to get: $$a[a,b]b - (a[a,b]b + [a,b]b) - (a[a,b]b+a[a,b]) + (a[a,b]b + a[a,b] + [a,b]b + [a,b]) =0,$$
or, on simplifying, $$[a,b]=0,$$ as desired.
Orignal proof
Consider $$a^2+2a^2b+a^2b^2=a^2(1+b)^2$$ $$=(a(1+b))^2=(a+ab)^2 = a^2+a^2b + aba + abab.$$ Now use that $a^2b^2 = abab$, and cancel $a^2+a^2b+abab$ from both sides to get $$ a^2b = aba.$$
By symmetry, we must also have $ba^2=aba$, by considering $(1+b)^2a^2$.
Now consider $(1+a)^2(1+b)^2$. Expanding this directly, we get $$(1+2a+a^2)(1+2b+b^2)$$ $$ = 1+2b+b^2 + 2a+4ab + 2ab^2 + a^2 + 2a^2b + a^2 b^2$$ On the other hand, we also have $$(1+a)^2(1+b)^2=((1+a)(1+b))^2 = (1+a+b+ab)^2,$$ which expands to $$ 1 + a + b + ab + a + a^2 + ab + a^2b + b + ba + b^2 + bab + ab + aba + ab^2 + abab $$ $$ = 1 + 2a + 2b + 3ab + a^2 + a^2b + ba + b^2 + bab + aba + ab^2 + abab. $$ Now use that $bab=ab^2$, $aba=a^2b$, and $abab=a^2b^2$ to rewrite this as $$ 1 + 2a + 2b + 3ab + a^2 + 2a^2b + ba + b^2 + 2ab^2 + a^2b^2. $$ Thus we end up with the equality, $$ 1 + 2a + 2b +4ab + a^2 + b^2 + 2ab^2 + 2a^2b + a^2 b^2$$ $$=1 + 2a + 2b + 3ab + ba + a^2 + b^2 + 2a^2b + 2ab^2 + a^2b^2. $$ Cancelling $1+2a+2b+3ab+a^2+b^2+2a^2b+2ab^2+a^2b^2$, we end up with $$ab=ba,$$ as desired.