I'm trying to solve Exercise 20.7 in Bandit Algorithms by Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesv´ari, where it states that if the condition for the original Hoeffding-Azuma inequality is met on an event $A$, i.e. $$ \mathbb{P}\left(\text { exists } t \in[n]: A \text { and } X_t \notin\left[a_t, b_t\right]\right)=0, $$ then for any $\varepsilon>0,$ $$ \mathbb{P}\left(A \cap \sum_{t=1}^n\left(X_t-\mathbb{E}\left[X_t \mid \mathcal{F}_{t-1}\right]\right) \geq \varepsilon\right) \leq \exp \left(-\frac{2 n^2 \varepsilon^2}{\sum_{t=1}^n\left(b_t-a_t\right)^2}\right). $$ I've tried to bound the mgf but falied because the event $A$ breaks the martingale structure and I just don't know how to handle it. I've also read the reference, In Probabilistic methods for algorithmic discrete mathematics, pages 195–248, by C. McDiarmid, where a special event is considered, but I still can't see how to prove it in the general case.
2026-03-27 11:24:32.1774610672
Extension of Hoeffding-Azuma inequality
126 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MARTINGALES
- CLT for Martingales
- Find Expected Value of Martingale $X_n$
- Need to find Conditions to get a (sub-)martingale
- Martingale conditional expectation
- Sum of two martingales
- Discrete martingale stopping time
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- Prove that the following is a martingale
- Are all martingales uniformly integrable
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
Related Questions in MACHINE-LEARNING
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Can someone explain the calculus within this gradient descent function?
- Gaussian Processes Regression with multiple input frequencies
- Kernel functions for vectors in discrete spaces
- Estimate $P(A_1|A_2 \cup A_3 \cup A_4...)$, given $P(A_i|A_j)$
- Relationship between Training Neural Networks and Calculus of Variations
- How does maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) differs from maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)
- To find the new weights of an error function by minimizing it
- How to calculate Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension?
- maximize a posteriori
Related Questions in CONCENTRATION-OF-MEASURE
- Improved Bennet Inequality for Vector-Valued RV
- Concentration of the norm (sub-gaussianity)
- A simple proof of McDiarmid's inequality?
- On the 1/2 assumption on concentration of measure on continuous cube
- Concentration inequalities for supremum of moving average
- A problem of proving that a certain concentration inequality cannot be improved
- To establish an inequality using Chebyshev's probability bound
- Concentration inequalities on the supremum of average
- Books about exponential tilting
- Hoeffding's inequality for dependent random variable
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $a_t \le b_t$ be fixed numbers. Define $$ \mathcal{E}_t := \{X_t \in [a_t,b_t]\}\\ \mathcal{E}_{\le t}:= \{\forall s \le t, X_t \in [a_t,b_t]\} = \bigcap_{s \le t} \mathcal{E}_{s} \\ \mathcal{E} := \{\forall t, X_t \in [a_t,b_t]\}.$$ Finally let $\mu_t := \mathbb{E}[X_t|\mathscr{F}_{t-1}],$ and $S_t := \sum_{s \le t} X_s - \mu_s$.
Now for any $\lambda, \varepsilon > 0,$ \begin{align} P(\mathcal{E} \cap \{S_n > \varepsilon\}) &= P(\mathcal{E} \cap \{e^{-\lambda \varepsilon + \lambda S_n } \ge 1 \}) \\ &= P(\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{E}} \cdot e^{-\lambda\varepsilon +\lambda S_n } \ge 1) \\ &\le e^{-\lambda \varepsilon} \mathbb{E}[ \mathbf{1}_\mathcal{E} e^{\lambda S_n}].\end{align}
Now conditioning on $\mathscr{F}_{n-1}$ like in Azuma's inequality, notice that $$ \mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{E}} e^{\lambda S_n}|\mathscr{F}_{n-1}] = \mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{E}_{\le n-1}} e^{\lambda S_{n-1}}\mathbb{E}[ \mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{E}_n}e^{\lambda (S_n - S_{n-1})} |\mathscr{F}_{n-1}].$$ Further, on ${\mathcal{E}_n}, (S_n - S_{n-1}) = X_n - \mu_n \in [a_t-\mu_n, b_t-\mu_n],$ where notice that $\mu_n$ is $\mathscr{F}_{n-1}$-measurable. So the random variable $S_n - S_{n-1}$ has bounded range given $\mathcal{E}_n$ and $\mathscr{F}_{n-1}$, and we can hit this with Hoeffding's lemma to conclude that $$ \mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{E}_n} e^{\lambda (S_n - S_{n-1})} |\mathscr{F}_{n-1}] = \mathbf{E}[ e^{\lambda (S_n - S_{n-1})} | \mathscr{F}_{n-1}, \mathcal{E}_n] P(\mathcal{E}_n|\mathscr{F}_{n-1}) \le e^{\lambda^2 (b_n - a_n)^2/8}.$$
But now we're in business - iterate this argument to conclude tha the MGF is bounded by $e^{\lambda^2 \sum (b_t - a_t)^2/8}$ and conclude as usual. Finally notice that for any event $A$, $ A \cap \mathcal{E}_{\le n } \subset \mathcal{E}_{\le n},$ and so the same result has to hold for $P( A \cap \mathcal{E}_{\le n} \cap \{S_n \ge \varepsilon\}).$