I have a question about a equation in the proof of Prop. 3.1.16 in Liu's "Algebraic Geometry" (page 83):
$\DeclareMathOperator{\Spec}{Spec}$
Why the equation $(X \times _Y V) \times _V \Spec k(y) = f^{-1} (V) _y$ holds, where $Q \times _S R$ means the fiber product of $S$-schemes Q and R?
$\DeclareMathOperator{\Spec}{Spec}$Oh I get what he's saying now. $X \times_Y V$ is isomorphic to $f^{-1}(V)$. This implies that $(X \times_Y V) \times_V \Spec \kappa(y) \cong f^{-1}(V) \times_V \Spec \kappa(y) = f^{-1}(V)_y$. This can be seen in the same way as my previous answer, by showing that $f^{-1}(V)$, together with the maps $i:f^{-1}(V) \rightarrow X$ and $f': f^{-1}(V) \rightarrow V$, satisfies the required universal property.
If you want an intuitive reason for why isomorphisms like this should hold, just imagine you're in the category of sets. If $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is a map of sets, and $V \subseteq Y$, then the fiber product $X \times_Y V$ is literally
$$X \times_Y V = \{ (x,v) \in X \times V : f(x) = v \}$$
which you can identify with $f^{-1}(V)$.
You can actually make this intuition precise by giving a different proof of these isomorphisms, using the Yoneda lemma.