Let $X$ be a vector space, $(X_i)$ a collection of (not necessarily locally convex) topological vector spaces, and $T_i \colon X_i \to X$ linear maps. Then the $T_i$ coinduce a final topology $\mathcal{T}_1$ on $X$, i.e., the finest topology on $X$ with respect to which the $T_i$ are continuous.
On the other hand, the lattice of vector topologies on $X$ is join-complete (since the initial topology induced by topological vector spaces is a vector topology), hence complete, so there is a finest vector topology $\mathcal{T}_2$ such that the $T_i$ are continuous.
Of course $\mathcal{T}_2 \subseteq \mathcal{T}_1$, and we do not in general have equality. (For instance, if there is only one $X_i$ and $T_i$ is not surjective, then $T_i[X_i]$ is clopen in $\mathcal{T}_1$.) But what assumptions are sufficient to ensure equality?
If the $X_i$ are locally convex then we can do something similar (since the lattice of locally convex topologies on $X$ is also join-complete) and obtain a finest locally convex topology $\mathcal{T}_3 \subseteq \mathcal{T}_2$. When do we have equality between the $\mathcal{T}_j$ in this case?
As an example of sufficient conditions, check Bourbaki, "Topological vector spaces", ch 3, sec 1.4. There is a proposition:
and lemma
That is inductive limit in category of locally convex spaces and in category of topological spaces are the same.