I have a 2-D matrix for all participants to a number of Rock Paper Scissor (RPS) games played between a number of participants. Each row is labeled for the winning participant, and each column is labeled for the losing participant. Each cell contains the percentage of RPS wins. Here is an example for four individuals labeled a, b, c and d. Imagine that the columns are labeled the same. So a always wins against b, and wins 50% of the times against c; b wins both against c and d; c always loses against d. $$\begin{matrix} a\\b\\c\\d\\\end{matrix} \begin{bmatrix}\ 0&1&0.5&0\\ 0&0&1&1\\ 0.5&0&0&0\\ 1&0&1&0 \end{bmatrix}$$ Because some participants always play the same, I expect to find a 100% in those cells. I'm trying to determine a simple matrix manipulation to find all the participants that play the same strategy, by quickly extracting the combinations. Is there anything in graph theory that suggests a way of dealing with this problem? I've been trying to turn all cells that are not 100% into $0$, let's call this matrix A, $$\mathbf{A=} \ \begin{bmatrix}\ 0&1&0.5&0\\ 0&0&1&1\\ 0.5&0&0&0\\ 1&0&1&0 \end{bmatrix}$$ then adding $1$ to the diagonal to obtain matrix D, $$\mathbf{D=} \ \begin{bmatrix}\ 1&1&0.5&0\\ 0&1&1&1\\ 0.5&0&1&0\\ 1&0&1&1 \end{bmatrix}$$ and then multiplying with dot product matrices $D\cdot A$, $$\mathbf{D \cdot A=} \begin{bmatrix}\ 0.25&1&1.5&1\\ 1.5&0&2&1\\ 0.5&0.5&0.25&0\\ 1.5&1&1.5&0 \end{bmatrix}$$ but I'm not sure how to make progress.
2026-04-23 01:31:52.1776907912
Find Graph Connections for Rock Paper Scissor game
96 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in GAME-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Perfect Information Game and Chance node
- Valid operations to the value of a matrix game
- Rook Game Problem Solving
- Proof of Axiom of Transparency in Aumman's model of knowledge
- Sion's MinMax theorem over matrices
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- How to prove that a strategy profile is a Proper Equilibrium?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I found an answer, which is consists first in setting to 0 all elements that are not 1. This eliminates all encounters where the players played mixed strategies, leaving only plays where there is a higher chance that the players used pure strategies. Then I dot multiply the matrix by itself twice. The matrix itself gives for each row the columns corresponding to an individual playing a losing strategy. The first dot multiplication gives for each row the column corresponding to the individual twice removed from the corresponding player; the second dot multiplication gives for each row the corresponding column of the players that play the same strategy. Higher numbers would indicate that the there are more connecting paths to that player, thus higher chance of playing the same strategy. So in the example given we would first modify the initial matrix to \begin{bmatrix} 0&1&0&0\\ 0&0&1&1\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 1&0&1&0 \end{bmatrix} and after the twice multiplication is done twice we obtain as a result: \begin{bmatrix} 1&0&1&0\\ 0&1&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&1&1 \end{bmatrix} This indicates that the player in the first row has the same strategy as the player in the 3rd and 4th column; that the player in the 2nd row has the same strategy as the player in the 1st and 3rd column; that the player in the 4th row has the same strategy as the player in the 2nd column.