Suppose that a wooden cube, whose edge is $3$ inch, is painted red, then cut into $27$ pieces of $1$ inch edge. Find total surface area of unpainted?
First of all, I have tried to draw the cube using MS Paint, below is given picture:

The surface area of cube is $6\cdot a^2$, where $a$ is the length of cube, when cube is painted, I'm trying to imagine it visually, how much surface would be unpainted?
If it's painted,does not it mean that all pages are painted?
EDIT:
A $3\times3\times3$ cube gets painted red. Then it gets split into $27$, $1\times1\times1$ cubes.
Find the number of painted faces:
On the $3$ inch cube, there are $9$ $1$-inch faces on each face, and there are $6$ such faces, so the total red 1-inch faces is: $$ 9\cdot 6=54 $$ Find the total number of faces of all the cubes:
There are $6$ faces per cube and $27$ cubes, so: $$ 27\cdot 6=162. $$ Of these, we know $54$ are painted: $$ 162-54=108 $$ There is a total of $108$ unpainted $1\times1$ squares each having an area of 1, so there are $108$ unpainted square inches.
EDIT:
I'd like to post also my approaches if the cube would be divided into two identical parts, actually if we have a cube with length $a$, divided into $2$ parts, then we get two cubes, which volume is $a^3/2$.
So length is the cubic root of $a^3/2$, or length of this two cubes is $a$ divided by cubic root of $2$.
Now we have length $3$, which means that it's length would be $3$ divided by cubic root of $2$, on each face with length $3$, we would have: $$ \frac{9}{3/\sqrt[3]{2}}=3\cdot \sqrt[3]{2} $$ in total $4$ such cubes, so $2*4$ of such faces, total face would be $2*6=12$,so unpainted would be $12-8=4$ is it correct?
This answer requires some spatial examples, so I think it will be better if I generalize the case of a simple cube, which can be applied to all possible situations.
As you said, the total area covered by the paint in a cube with lenght $a$ is equal to: $$ S_{\mathrm{ext}}=6\cdot a^2 $$ But then the division into $27$ cubes with lenght $1/3$ of the original gives the new surface area, greater than the original because new slices prodce more internal surface; so now the total surface is expressed by: $$ S_{\mathrm{tot}}=27\cdot 6\cdot (a/3)^2=\frac{27\cdot 6}{9}\cdot a^2=3\cdot 6\cdot a^2=3S_{\mathrm{ext}} $$ Now think about a Rubik's Cube, with only the cubes facing the outside are painted: since you know that the total amount of paint occupies the external surface $S_{\mathrm{ext}}$, then to know the surface not covered in paint you have to simply subtract to the total sliced surface $S_{\mathrm{tot}}$ the external one: $$ S_{\mathrm{unpaint}}=S_{\mathrm{tot}}-S_{\mathrm{ext}}=3S_{\mathrm{ext}}-S_{\mathrm{ext}}=2S_{\mathrm{ext}}=12\cdot a^2 $$ Now you have basically derived the sum of the internal surface of every little cube, because the sum of the external is nothing more than the total covered in paint, or $S_{\mathrm{ext}}$ (with the Rubik's Cube case, the only cubes coloured).
EDIT: If the number of slices is not defined, it is generalized to a single parameter $n\in \mathbb{N}$, then the new surface tends to be greater as $n$ gets larger.
Let's assume that one cut is repeated on every edge of the cube, so if an edge is divided in three (with two slices), then the number of cubes created is expressed as follows: $$ N_{\mathrm{cubes}}=(n+1)^3 $$ So if I "slice" a cube for every edge once ($n=1$), I get $N_{\mathrm{cubes}}=(2)^3=8$ little cubes.
The surface of each sub-cube is expressed by: $$ S_{\mathrm{sub-cb}}=6\cdot\left(\frac{a}{n+1}\right)^2 $$ Then the total surface is expressed as th single one multiplied by the total number of sub-cubes created $N_{\mathrm{cubes}}$: $$ S_{\mathrm{tot}}=(n+1)^3\cdot 6\cdot\left(\frac{a}{n+1}\right)^2=(n+1)\cdot 6\cdot a^2=(n+1)\cdot S_{\mathrm{ext}} $$ Now, applying the same deduction as before, the surface not covered with paint is given by a simple subtraction between the total surface and the ponly painted one, which is the external one: $$ S_{\mathrm{unpaint}}=S_{\mathrm{tot}}-S_{\mathrm{ext}}=(n+1)\cdot S_{\mathrm{ext}}-S_{\mathrm{ext}}=n\cdot S_{\mathrm{ext}} $$ Now remember that the parameter $n$ is the number of slices, and not the sub-cubes created; as your previous example, the slices were $2$, and so this number appeared inside the final result.