Find largest stopping time such that the stopped process is a submartingale

63 Views Asked by At

Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t=0,1,...,T},P$) be a filtered probability space. Let $X=(X_t)_{t=0,1...,T}$ an adapted process (to $\mathcal{F}_t=\sigma(X_0,...,X_t)$) that is integrable (i. e. $E(|X_t|)<\infty$), $t=0,1,...,T$. What is the largest stopping time $\tau: \Omega \to \{0,1,...,T\}$ such that the stopped process $X^{\tau}$ is a submartingale?

My ideas

  • I know that the stopped process is also adapted
  • I know about the Optional Sampling theorem.

"largest" stopping time means that for every other stopping time $\tau'$ for which $X^{\tau'}$ is a submartingale we have $P(\tau'\leq \tau')=1$, so it is "almost certain" the case.

I was given a hint elsewhere to look at the Doob decomposition theorem. But looking at the doob decomposition, how can I derive the largest stopping time?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

$\require{cancel}$ Hint : By Doob's decomposition, we know that for all times $t$, we can write $$X_t = M_t + A_t $$

Where $M$ is a martingale and $A$ is integrable, predictable and satisfies $A_0 = 0$. Now let $\tau$ be any stopping time : by definition, $X^\tau$ is a submartingale if and only $\mathbb E[X_{t+1\wedge\tau}\mid \mathcal F_t]\ge X_{t\wedge\tau} $, that is, if and only if

$$\mathbb E[M_{t+1\wedge\tau}\mid \mathcal F_t] + \mathbb E[A_{t+1\wedge\tau}\mid \mathcal F_t] = \cancel{M_{t\wedge\tau}}+ \mathbb E[A_{t+1\wedge\tau}\mid \mathcal F_t]\ge \cancel{M_{t\wedge\tau}} + A_{t\wedge\tau}, \ \ \forall t\in\{ 0,\ldots,T-1 \} $$

Where we have used linearity of conditional expectation and the optional stopping theorem.

Now because $A$ is predictable, it holds that for all $s\le t+1$, $A_s$ is $\mathcal F_t$ measurable. This implies that the above sufficient and necessary condition for $X^\tau$ to be a submartingale can equivalently be restated as $$ A_{t+1\wedge \tau} \ge A_{t\wedge\tau}, \ \ \forall t\in\{ 0,\ldots,T-1 \} \tag1 $$

Can you find a stopping time which makes this condition hold ? (And can you check that it is indeed the largest such stopping time ?)


Added : Ok, let me give a solution based on my hint above and what I wrote in the comments. But before that, another (hopefully) "intuitive" explanation of how $\tau$ may be found : Doob's theorem tells us that we can write $X$ as a sum of a martingale $M$ and some arbitrary predictable process $A$. If we want $X^\tau$ to be a submartingale, that means we want $X^\tau$ to be nondecreasing "in expectation". However, $M$ is "constant", so really, the only way to make $X^\tau$ a submartingale is to pick $\boldsymbol\tau$ such that $A^\tau$ is almost surely non-decreasing.

Well, so far it seems like I just restated $(1)$ in a very unprecise fashion, but think about it : what stopping time (which can involve all the $A_t$'s up to $A_{t+1}$) can guarantee that $A^\tau$ is non-decreasing ? That would precisely be "the first instant $t$ where the sequence $(A_t)$ starts to decrease", or equivalently "the last instant $t$ up to which $(A_t)$ is non-decreasing". Yes, it's really that simple ! More formally, we can let $\tau$ be defined as
$$\tau(\omega) := \begin{cases}\inf\{t=0,\ldots, T-1 : A_{t+1}(\omega)< A_t(\omega)\},\ \text{ if the inf is attained},\\ T \text{ otherwise}\end{cases}$$ (that splitting in two cases is purely a technicality due to the fact that $A_{T+1}$ is not defined.)

If you followed the above explanation, you may have an intuitive idea of why $\tau$ has to be the solution to our problem, but we still need to check that formally :

  • That $\tau$ is a stopping time follows from the predictability of $A$ : indeed the event $\{\tau=t\}=\{A_{t+1}<A_t\}\cap\{A_{s+1}\ge A_s, 0\le s \le t-1\}$ is given by the intersection of finitely many events of $\mathcal F_t$ and thus belongs itself in $\mathcal F_t$ (I encourage you to double check that all of these sets are indeed in $\mathcal F_t$)
  • That $X^\tau$ is a submartingale should be clear from the definition of $\tau$, but let's prove it anyway : as we said, $X^\tau$ is a submartingale iff $A^\tau$ is a.s. increasing. But for any $t$, either $t\ge \tau(\omega)$ in which case $A_{t+1\wedge\tau}=A_{t\wedge\tau} =A_{\tau(\omega)}$, or $t<\tau(\omega)$, in which case by definition of $\tau$ we have $A_{t+1\wedge\tau}=A_{t+1}\ge A_{t} =A_{t\wedge\tau}$. So $X^\tau$ is indeed a submartingale.
  • Lastly, we check that $\tau$ is maximal : indeed, assume for the sake of contradiction that there exits another stopping time $\theta$ such that $X^\theta$ is a submartingale and $\theta \ge \tau +1 $ on a positive measure set (this necessarily implies $\tau\le T-1$, as $X$ is not defined otherwise). Then, because $X^\theta$ is a submartingale, we have for all $\omega$ belonging in this positive measure event that for $t \in[\tau(\omega),\theta(\omega)-1]$ : $$A_{t+1\wedge\theta(\omega)} \ge A_{t\wedge\theta(\omega)} \implies A_{t +1}\ge A_{t}. $$ Which contradicts the definition of $\tau$ and thus implies that $\tau$ is indeed the largest stopping time which makes $X^\tau$ a submartingale.

Hope that helps !