I was watching this video by Flammable Maths about why $$ \begin{pmatrix} 3 &4\\ 6&8 \end{pmatrix}^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 33 &44\\ 66&88 \end{pmatrix} $$ In the video, it is left as a challenge for the viewer to see if you can generalize the result as follows:
Given some $k \in \mathbb{N}\cap[2,\infty), $ can you find a matrix $A\in \mathcal{M}_{n \times n} (\mathbb{N})$ such that $A^k =\left( \sum_{i=1}^{k}10^{i-1} \right)A$?
I attempted a solution to this problem and did the following. I supposed (with the intention of hopefully simplifying calculations) that $A$ is diagonalizable. This means that I can write the equation we want as $$ PD^{k} P^{-1}= \left( \sum_{i=1}^{k}10^{i-1} \right)PD P^{-1} $$ Now, taking the determinant on both sides I get that \begin{align*} &|P||D|^k|P^{-1}| = \left( \sum_{i=1}^{k}10^{i-1} \right)^n |P||D| |P^{-1}|\\ \implies & \left(\prod_{j=1}^n \lambda_j\right)^k = \left( \sum_{i=1}^{k}10^{i-1} \right)^n\left(\prod_{j=1}^n \lambda_j\right)\\ \implies & \prod_{j=1}^n \lambda_j^{k-1} = \left( \sum_{i=1}^{k}10^{i-1} \right)^n \end{align*} where the $\lambda_j$'s are the eigenvalues of $A$. From here I think that if I find a set of eigenvalues that satisfy the above equation I can reconstruct a matrix which satisfies our original intended equation, however, I'm not sure if this is a good way to approach this problem.
Does anyone know a better way to solve this? Or does anyone have any other ideas on how to tackle it? Ideally, I would like to find some patter or family of matrices which satisfy the desired property, buy any and all suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!
Edit:
As pointed out by levap in the comments, it's impossible to find a solution of a matrix made up of strictly positive integers for $k \ge 3$. However, to not get rid of the possibility of other interesting solutions and/or observations, I'll clarify that other types of solutions with matrices in $\mathcal{M}_n (\mathbb{Z})$, $\mathcal{M}_n (\mathbb{Q})$ or even in $\mathcal{M}_n (\mathbb{R})$ will happily be considered for the bounty if you think they're similar to the original problem. In short, if you find something you think is interesting, even if it's not too similar to $\begin{pmatrix} 3 &4\\ 6&8 \end{pmatrix}$, please post them nevertheless. Thank you!
Here's a solution for all $k$: take a $(k-1) \times (k-1)$ matrix $A$ with $A_{k-1,1} = \underbrace{11\dots1}_k$, $A_{i,i+1} = 1$ for $i=1,\dots,k-2$, and all other entries $0$. For example, for $k=6$, take the following $5 \times 5$ matrix: $$ \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 111111 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} $$ This works because $A$ satisfies $A \vec{e}_i = \vec e_{i-1}$ for $i=2,\dots,k-1$, and $A \vec e_1 = \underbrace{11\dots1}_k \vec e_{k-1}$. Therefore, for any $i$, $A^{k-1} \vec e_i = \underbrace{11\dots1}_k \vec e_i$, so $A^{k-1} = \underbrace{11\dots1}_kI$, and $A^k = \underbrace{11\dots1}_kA$.