I am looking for a formula which is true semantically but not syntactically in propositional intuitionist logic.
Does it exist? If yes what's that?
Thanks for your help.
I am looking for a formula which is true semantically but not syntactically in propositional intuitionist logic.
Does it exist? If yes what's that?
Thanks for your help.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
If with "true semantically" you are referring to Kripke semantics for intuitionistic logic, there is no such formula, because
If, instead, with "semantically true" you mean true with the "classical semantic" (e.g truth tables for propositional logic), then $P∨¬P$ is the simplest example of a formula which is (classically) true but underivable in intuitionsitic logic, because, due to Kripke's Sondness and Completeness Theorem, is not valid according to Kripke's semantic.