How can you find the Nash equilibrium of a game directly from the extensive form game/game tree of a game. You can find Nash equilibria from the strategic form (normal form table), but finding it directly from the extensive form seems very interesting as well. A position/strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium if it is a best response to other strategies of the other players. (The photo is in the link). Thank you.
How can we do this for the 3 player game tree below:enter image description here
It's a bit tedious to describe, but with enough practice, you should be able to follow the steps below to quickly identify NEs (not only the subgame perfect ones) from a game tree.
The idea is that you first suppose player 1 plays a certain strategy. Then you find out the best responses of the other players. Lastly you check whether the initially supposed strategy for player 1 is a best response to the other players' best responses (to it). If it is, you have a profile of mutually best responding strategies, hence a NE; if it isn't, then you don't have any NE with the initially supposed strategy of player 1.
Suppose player 1 plays $A$
Suppose player 1 plays $B$
Overall, there are three NEs: $(A,w,S)$, $(B,v,S)$, $(C,v,S)$, with the first being the only SPE.