This question is motivated mainly by the topology of first-countable spaces being uniquely determined by their notions of convergence of sequences: the closure of a set $A$ is the same as the set of sequential limit points of $A$. So topological notions involving filters should be equivalent to similar definitions involving sequences in first-countable spaces.
We say a uniform space is complete if every Cauchy filter converges.
We could also define sequential completeness from the convergence of every elementary Cauchy filter, in other words the convergence of every Cauchy sequence.
Are the notions of completeness and sequential completeness equivalent in a first-countable uniform space?
While the first paragraph motivates "yes", a uniform structure is more than a topological notion.
The way I thought to approach it is to try and find a way to associate to each filter a set of elementary filters, where the question of convergence of the filter is equivalent to the convergence of one elementary filter (see here), but the way I thought to do it does not work.
No, they are not equivalent, even for uniform spaces that are first countable (as topological spaces). The standard example would be $X = \omega_1$ in its uniformity (which is even unique, in this special case). The space $X$ is first countable and sequentially compact (which implies it is totally bounded as a uniform space) and sequentially complete as well (as a Cauchy sequence with a convergent subsequence is convergent). It it were complete, then it would be compact (as totally bounded complete uniform spaces are), which it is not ($\omega_1 + 1$ is its unique compactification).