I know the laplacian $\Delta$ has only positive eigenvalues, but why there is a first one? Assume $\Delta$ is acting on an appropriate set of real valued functions on the bounded domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$, $n \geq 2$, which vanish on $\partial \Omega$.
2026-03-31 19:12:10.1774984330
First eigenvalue of laplacian
324 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Consider
$$\left\{\begin{array}{c} −\Delta u = f & \text{on }\Omega \\ u(x)=0, \partial\Omega \end{array}\right.,$$
where $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^{N}$ is open, bounded and $f \in L^{2}(\Omega)$
See that $u \in H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)$ is a weak solution for the problem above if
$(u,v)_{H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)} = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega} \nabla u \nabla v = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega} fv $ for all $v \in H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)$.
Defining $g(v) = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega} fv$, use the Riesz Representation Theorem to conclude that problem has a unique solution. Moreover, is well defined the "solution operador":
$S: L^{2}(\Omega) \rightarrow H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)$, where for each $f_{0} \in L^{2}(\Omega)$, we have $S(f_{0})=u_{0}$ where
$$\left\{\begin{array}{c} −\Delta u_{0} = f_{0} & \text{on }\Omega \\ u_{0}(x)=0, \partial\Omega \end{array}\right.,$$
One can show that $S$ is linear, compact and self-adjoint. Then by Spectral Theory, exists a sequence $(\mu_{n})$ of postives eigenvalues of S, such that:
$\displaystyle\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \mu_{n} = 0$ and $ \mu_{1} < \mu_{2} < ... < \mu_{n} < ...$
we say that $\lambda $ is a eigenvalue of Laplacian when
$\displaystyle\int_{\Omega} \nabla \phi \nabla v = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega} (\lambda \phi)v$ for all $ v \in H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)$.
Note that if $\mu$ is eigenvalue of $S$ then $\lambda = \dfrac{1}{\mu}$ is a eigenvalue of Laplacian. Then, exits a sequence $(\lambda_{n})$ of eigenvalues of Laplacian such that
$\lambda_{1} > \lambda_{2} > ... >\lambda_{n} > ...$