In the sphere $S^n$, the focal set of a point is its antipodal point. How about the focal set of a closed geodesic? My guess is that it is another geodesic, but I can neither prove it nor know it is correct.
2026-03-29 05:12:04.1774761124
Focal set of a geodesic
334 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in SPHERICAL-GEOMETRY
- Name of some projection of sphere onto $\mathbb{R}^2$
- Can you generalize the Triangle group to other polygons?
- motion on the surface of a 3-sphere
- What length would the sides of a triangle over Earth's surface be for the sum of its angles to be 180.1°
- why is the content of a n-sphere given by $\int_{0}^{R} S_nr^{n-1}dr = {S_nR^n \over n} $?
- Rotate a point according to a perpendicular point
- Rotate the surface of a sphere using altitude
- Is there a nice way to calculate $\int (1-x_3)^2$ over the hemisphere?
- Integrate the normal vector over a spherical polygon
- Spherical Geometry inequalities with triangles using main formula
Related Questions in GEODESIC
- Length of geodesic line equals distance between two points?
- What's the relation between the Darboux Frame and the Frenet-Serret on a oriented surface?
- Projection from an ellipsoid onto a sphere that preserves geodesy?
- Vector field on a geodesic
- Geodesic lines of the form f(at+b)
- How to actually find a minimizing path on a manifold?
- Calculating the round metric on $S^n$
- Geodesic equation on a codimension 1 submanifold of $\mathbb{R^{n+1}}$
- How can you numerically approximate the geodesic midpoint of 2 points on an ellipsoids?
- Compute geodesic circles on a Surface
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In $S^n$, the focal set of a closed geodesic is a totally geodesic submanifold of dimension $n-2$, obtained as follows: Let $\gamma$ be a closed geodesic and let $C\subseteq S^n$ be its image. Then $C$ is the intersection of $S^n$ with a $2$-dimensional linear subspace $\Pi\subseteq \mathbb R^{n+1}$, and the focal set of $C$ is the intersection of $S^n$ with the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace orthogonal to $\Pi$. It's a submanifold isometric to $S^{n-2}$ and disjoint from $C$.
Thus the OP's intuition is correct in the special case $n=3$: The focal set of a closed geodesic in $S^3$ is another geodesic. And Ted Shifrin's intuition is correct when $n=2$: The focal set of a closed geodesic in $S^2$ is a pair of antipodal points. But in other dimensions, the focal set is larger.
One way to prove the claim is to use the relationship between singular values of the exponential map and Jacobi fields. In the case of conjugate points, this is a familiar story in Riemannian geometry: Given $q\in M$, a point $p\in M$ is called a conjugate point of $\boldsymbol q$ if it is a singular value of the restricted exponential map $\exp_p\colon T_pM \to M$, which is equivalent to the existence of a geodesic $\sigma$ from $p$ to $q$ and a nontribial Jacobi field along $\sigma$ that vanishes at $p$ and $q$.
For focal points, the story is similar but perhaps less well known. A focal point of a submanifold $C$ is a singular value of the normal exponential map $\exp|_{NC}\colon NC\to M$, where $NC$ is the normal bundle of $C$ in $M$. In the case that $C$ is totally geodesic, a proof very similar to the one for conjugate points shows that $p\in M$ is a focal point of $C$ if and only if there is a geodesic segment $\sigma\colon[0,b]\to M$ and a Jacobi field $J\colon [0,b]\to TM$ along $\sigma$ satisfying
(When $C$ is not totally geodesic, the condition $D_tJ(0)=0$ has to be replaced by $D_tJ(0) = - W_{\sigma'(0)} (J(0))$, where $W_{\sigma'(0)}$ is the shape operator or Weingarten map in the direction of the normal vector $\sigma'(0)$. I don't know of a source that works this out in full detail, but most of these ideas can be found in Chavel's Riemannian Geometry: A Modern Introduction or Gray's Tubes.)
In $S^n$, because the sectional curvature is identically $1$, it's easy to solve the Jacobi equation. In particular, every Jacobi field that satisfies $D_tJ(0)=0$ is of the form $J(t) = (\cos t)E(t)$ for some vector field $E$ that's parallel along the geodesic. Thus every geodesic that starts orthogonal to $C$ hits a focal point exactly at distance $\pi/2$. A little reflection should convince you that the collection of all such focal points is exactly the $(n-2)$-sphere "orthogonal" to $C$.