This question pertains to the topic titled: Is this local martingale a true martingale?
(Find it here!)
"Using the Ito's formula I have shown that $X_t$ is a local martingale, because $\mathrm{d}X_t = \underline{\phantom{b_t}} \mathrm{d} B_t$",
Can someone please explain this opening phrase to the original question to me further? I can not get my head around why $X_t$ would not indeed be a true martingale if it is written in this form (all Ito integrals are martingales! (?)).
In fact, not ALL Ito integrals are martingales. For instance, an Ito integral $\int_0^T f(t,\omega)dW_t$ is well defined for the class of stochastic processes $\mathcal P=\{f=f(t,\omega)\mid f \text{ is non-anticipating, jointly measurable and} \mathsf P(\int_0^Tf^2(t,\omega)dt<\infty)=1\}$ and in this case $\int_0^t f(s,\omega)dW_s, t \in [0,T]$ is local martingale, which will be square integrable martingale iff $\mathsf E \int_0^T f^2(s,\omega)\, ds<\infty$.
In the case, mentioned above, that process is a square integrable martingale.