I'm trying to proof that the following diagram in the category of groups with $i_1$ and $i_2$ being inclusions is a pushout iff $G$ is the free product with amalgamation (up to isomorphism). It should be sufficient to proof $"\Leftarrow"$ since the pushout is unique up to isomorphism. How does the proof of $"\Leftarrow"$ go? \begin{array}{ccc} G_0 & \xrightarrow{i_1} & G_1 \\ \downarrow_{i_2} & & \downarrow_{\varphi_1}\\ G_2 & \xrightarrow{\varphi_2} & G \end{array} I tried defining the unique homomorphism of the pushout by $$\phi((g_1*...*g_n)N) = h_i(g_1)*...*h_i(g_n)$$ but couldn't proof it's well-definedness.
2026-03-25 20:35:53.1774470953
free product with amalgamation is correspondingly a pushout
1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in FREE-PRODUCT
- Proof check, existence of free product
- Is the map $G*H \to G \times H$ injective?
- Is free product of groups always bigger that direct product?
- Uniqueness of free product
- Let $Y:=\mathbb{R}^2-\{(0,1),(1,0),(-1,0)\}$. Calculate $\pi_1(Y,y_0)$, where $y_0=(0,0)$.
- Is the intersection of two subgroups, defined below, always trivial?
- Presentations of Amalgamated Free Products of Two Groups.
- Find a space whose fundamental group is $\mathbb Z/2 × \mathbb Z$
- Finite index subgroups in Amalgamated Free products
- Semidirect factors of free product of two groups
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Just think of $i_1$ and $i_2$ as inclusion, even so there are not necessarily. Given two maps $h_i \colon G_i \to H, i \in \{1,2\}$, there is an induced one $h \colon G_1 \ast G_2 \to H$ defined as $h_i$ when restricting to the letters of $G_i$. (This is clearly well-defined.)
Now, what happens when $h_1$ and $h_2$ agree on $G_0$ ? It means that $h_1(x)=h_2(x)$ for any $x \in G_0$. In other word, $\ker (h)$ contains all the $x^{(1)}\ast{x^{(2)}}^{-1}$ for $x \in G_0$ (where the parenthesized exponent indicates where the letter $x$ comes from) and so also the normal subgroup generated by those. It exactly means that you can factor $h$ by the quotient $$ G_1 \ast_{G_0} G_2 = (G_1 \ast G_2) \mathop{\big/} \left\langle g \left(x^{(1)}\ast {x^{(2)}}^{-1}\right)g^{-1} : x\in G_0, g \in G_1 \ast G_2 \right\rangle .$$ QED.
Now just do the same but taking into account $i_1,i_2$. Hint : it does not change much !