I've been working on this problem for a while:
Let $n > 2$ be an integer. Let $f$ be a function from the set of all integers to itself with the following property: If the integers $a_1, a_2, a_3, \dots, a_n$ form an arithmetic progression, then the numbers $f(a_1), f(a_2), \dots f(a_n)$ form an arithmetic progression in some order (that's possibly constant). Determine all values $n$ such that the only functions $f$ with the above property are the functions in this form: $f(x)=bx+c$, where $b$ and $c$ are integers.
My work is most likely trivial, but I wrote $a_1, a_2, \dots a_n$ as $a_1, a_1+x, a_1+2x, \dots, a_1+(n-1)x$. Then, applying $f(x)=bx+c$ to each term in the sequence, I got that the values of the sequence were $$ba_1+c, b(a_1+x)+d, \dots, b(a_1+(n-1)x)+d.$$ However, I'm unable to make more progress.
Thanks for any form of help!
(Fill in the gaps as needed, especially when it says "Show that". If you're stuck, explain what you've tried.)
Claim: For $n$ prime, the function $f(a) = ( a \mod n )$ satisfies the conditions.
Proof: Show that any AP of length $n$, taken modulo $n$ (prime), is either
In either case, $ f(a_i)$ forms an AP. $_\square$
Suppose that for some $n$, we had such a non-linear function $f(x)$.
Suppose that the function is not injective.
Let $k$ be the minimum positive integer such that there exists $ |a-b| = k$ and $ f(a) = f(b)$. WLOG, let $ a < b$.
Show that $ f(x) $ is a constant, which is a contradiction.
Consider the AP's $ \{ f(a+i + j)\}_{j=0}^{n-1}$ going from $ i = 0$ to $ i = k+1 - n > 1$.
Since $ f(a) \neq f( a +n)$, and $ \{ f(a+j)_{j=0}^{n-1} \}, \{ f(a+1+j)_{j=0}^{n-1} \}$ both form an non-constant AP, show that $ \{ f(a), f(a + n) \} $ must be the minimum and maximum of $ \{ f(a+j) \} _{j=0}^n$.
WLOG, let $ f(a) < f(a+n)$, so $ f(a)$ is the minimum and $f(a+n)$ is the maximum.
Applying the same logic to $ f(a+1) \neq f(a+1+n)$, $\{ f(a+1), f(a +1+ n) \} $ must be the minimum and maximum of $ \{ f(a+j) \} _{j=1}^{n+1}$. Since $f(a+1) < f(a+n)$, hence $f(a+1)$ is the minimum and $f(a+1+n)$ is the maximum, so $ f(a+n) < f(a+n+1)$.
We thus get the chain of inequalities $ f(a) < f(a+n) < f(a+n+1) < \ldots < f(a+k)$, contradicting the choice of $k$. Thus, no such function is possible.
Show that for any non-trivial divisor $ d \mid n$, $ 1 < d < n$ , we have $ f(a) = f( a + \frac{k}{d} ) $. Thus, if $n$ is composite, no such function is possible.
Hence, a non-injective non-linear function could exist only if $k=n$ and $n$ is prime.
Now, suppose that the function is injective.
Using the same argument as in Case 2, show that
(Show that) $f(x) = f(0) + x ( f(1) - f(0) ) $ is a linear function.
Hence, a non-linear function could exist only if $k=n$ and $n$ is prime. We have shown above that such a solution exists.
For prime $n$, we have the following solution:
Let $ g: \mathbb{Z_n} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z_n}$ be a bijection. Then, $ f(a) = b \times g ( a \mod{n} ) + c $ satisfies the conditions. The solution at the top is the identity $ g(a \mod{n} ) = a \mod {n}$ and $b = 1, c = 0 $.
I believe that in Case 3, using the technique similar to Case 2, we can show that $f(x+n) = f(x)$ for all $x$, from which the solution follows.