I've come across some reference to a form of Mashke's theorem for rings; namely, $R[G]$ is semisimple if $R$ is a commutative ring (not necessarily a field) and $G$ is a finite group such that $|G|$ is a unit in $R$. However, I can't seem to find any source for this. Is this true? Where can I find a proof?
2026-02-23 04:01:44.1771819304
General form of Maschke's Theorem for $R[G]$
226 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FINITE-GROUPS
- List Conjugacy Classes in GAP?
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- existence of subgroups of finite abelian groups
- Online reference about semi-direct products in finite group theory?
- classify groups of order $p^2$ simple or not
- Show that for character $\chi$ of an Abelian group $G$ we have $[\chi; \chi] \ge \chi(1)$.
- The number of conjugacy classes of a finite group
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Finite group, How can I construct solution step-by-step.
Related Questions in NONCOMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- In a left noetherian ring, does having a left inverse for an element guarantee the existence of right inverse for that element?
- Are there rational coefficients that hold such properties?
- A characterization for minimal left ideals of semisimple rings
- $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$, with $A$ and $C$ simple rings, but $B$ is not a simple ring
- Simplicity of Noetherian $B$, $A \subseteq B\subseteq C$, where $A$ and $C$ are simple Noetherian domains
- Completion of localization equals the completion
- Representations of an algebra
- A characterization of semisimple module related to anihilators
- Counterexample request: a surjective endomorphism of a finite module which is not injective
Related Questions in GROUP-RINGS
- Why does the product in a group ring have finite support?
- What breaks if I use a $G$-module instead of a $\mathbb{K}[G]$-module: Induced reps, Frobenius reciprocity?
- About the matrix representation of group algebra
- Group algebra functor preserves colimits
- Group ring confusion
- The isomorphic between rings
- $\mathbb{Z}_p[\mathbb{Z}/p^{n}\mathbb{Z}]\cong \mathbb{Z}_p[T]/\left((T+1)^{p^n}-1\right)$ as topological rings?
- Homology of group rings
- Decomposition of $\mathbb{C}[G]$ / Orthogonality relations
- Center of Group algebra finitely generated
Related Questions in SEMI-SIMPLE-RINGS
- The ring $\mathrm{End}_D(V) $ is simple if $V$ is finite dimensional.
- A characterization for minimal left ideals of semisimple rings
- A characterization of semisimple module related to anihilators
- Example of a non-semiprime ring (or non right semisimple)
- Showing commutative semisimple ring with unity is direct sum of fields
- Associative algebra without nilpotent ideals is direct sum of minimal left ideals
- A module $M$ whose submodules and factor modules are semisimple but not semisimple itself
- A question about the group algebra $k[G]$ for a finite group $G$.
- Question about Hopkins-Levitzki Theorem's proof
- Matrix ring over a semi-simple algebra
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is not true as stated, e.g. because if we take $G$ to be trivial, then you would be stating that an arbitrary commutative ring $R$ is semi-simple, which is false.
But, if you assume that $R$ is commutative semi-simple, and that $|G|$ is a unit in $R$, then $R[G]$ is semi-simple. Since a semi-simple commutative ring is a product of fields, this quickly reduces to the case when $R$ is a field (in which $|G|$ is non-zero), and the usual argument with averaging over the elements of the group (possible because we can divide by $|G|$ in $R$) proves semi-simplicity.