$Y=XB+u$ where $X$ is a non random $n\times k$ Matrix, $\textrm{rank}(X)=k, E(u)=0, E(uu')=\sigma^2\Omega$, How to form $(1)$ How to proof $(2)$ the general Gauss-Markov theorem?
2026-03-26 09:16:10.1774516570
General Gauss-Markov theorem
443 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in LINEAR-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- A different way to define homomorphism.
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Find matrix representation based on two vector transformations
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- Assuming that A is the matrix of a linear operator F in S find the matrix B of F in R
- For what $k$ is $g_k\circ f_k$ invertible?
Related Questions in LINEAR-REGRESSION
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- How does the probabilistic interpretation of least squares for linear regression works?
- A question regarding standardized regression coefficient in a regression model with more than one independent variable
- Product of elements of a linear regression
- Covariance of least squares parameter?
- Contradiction in simple linear regression formula
- Prove that a random error and the fitted value of y are independent
- Is this a Generalized Linear Model?
- The expected value of mean sum of square for the simple linear regression
- How to get bias-variance expression on linear regression with p parameters?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Gauss-Markov Theorem states that the OLS estimator:
$$\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS} = (X'X)^{-1}X'Y$$
is Best Linear Unbiased. For the proof, I will focus on conditional expectations and variance: the results extend easily to non conditional. Also, for the proof, I consider $I_{n}$ $=$ $\Omega$, but the result extends easily to the non equal case as well.
Proof:
Is it unbiased?
$$E(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS} \mid X) = E[(X'X)^{-1}X'Y \mid X] = E[(X'X)^{-1}X'(X\boldsymbol{\beta} + u) \mid X] = \\ \boldsymbol{\beta} + (X'X)^{-1}X'E(u \mid X) = \boldsymbol{\beta}$$
Yes! Is it, then, among the unbiased, that with the smallest variance? Consider, for this purpose, a general linear unbiased estimator $\boldsymbol{b}$:
$$\boldsymbol{b} = C\boldsymbol{y}$$
where $C$ is a generic $k$ $\times$ $n$ matrix that depends only on the sample information in $X$ and, given unbiasedness, such that $CX$ $=$ $I_{k}$ to guarantee unbiasedness. Note that for $\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS}$, $C_{Ols}$ $=$ $(X'X)^{-1}X'$. It can be proved that:
$$Var(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS} \mid X) = \sigma^{2}(X'X)^{-1}$$
and, for the generic linear estimator:
$$Var(\boldsymbol{b} \mid X) = \sigma^{2}(C'C)^{-1}$$.
We can additionally define $D$ $=$ $C$ $-$ $C_{ols}$. It is immediate that $DX$ $=$ $0$. From it, we can finally conclude that:
\begin{align} Var(\boldsymbol{b} \mid X) &= \sigma^{2}[D - (X'X)^{-1}X'][D - X(X'X)^{-1}] \\ &= \sigma^{2}(X'X)^{-1} + \sigma^{2}DD' \\ &= Var(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS} \mid X) + \sigma^{2}DD' \\ &> Var(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{OLS} \mid X) \end{align}
Since DD' is non negative defined.