I'm trying to pool how people see a simple Ax=B system from a geometric point of view. So far, I can regard it, as a set of equations, that can be viewed as hyperplanes, or as linear combinations of column vectors scaled by x components that would reach B, or as seeing B as coordinates from identity to X, this one in local coordinates to transformation axes A.
I'm always asking myself if, those ideas are related between them by geometric means; I mean, if you could use a compass, rulers, protractor, draw unit circles, etc, transfer vector components to others dimensions or so, we would reach to a unified view of those?
I'm very dull at maths, thanks for the help.
well i managed to have some kind of view to a simple A (2x2) x (2x1) = B (2x1), there are for sure many other possibilities. Assuming that the hyperplane equations are normalized, A, b to n/||n|| . x = ||n||
I used 2 cartesian planes rotated by 90º in y axis, around the unit center, then:
the symmetry isnt good, because i had to rotate the 2nd set of y-coordinates to get the transposes. Also in the last push, i had to correct the last push to 1-x1. but this is the best i could get.
the whole cenario looks like a cdrom:
sorry if my question wasn't clear enough, i wanted a geometric setting for a simple Ax=B showing those two views, just using rotations and translations.