How does one prove George Polya's theorem in Pascal's Triangle that the number of shortest routes from the point representing $_0C_0$ to the point representing $_nC_r$ is $_nC_r$?
Here, $_nC_r = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}$.
How does one prove George Polya's theorem in Pascal's Triangle that the number of shortest routes from the point representing $_0C_0$ to the point representing $_nC_r$ is $_nC_r$?
Here, $_nC_r = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}$.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
We can do this by induction!
Base case. Let $n=1$. To get from ${0\choose0}$ to ${1\choose0}$ and from ${0\choose0}$ to ${1\choose 1}$ there is only one path in each case, since ${1\choose0}$ and ${1\choose1}$ are both adjacent to ${0\choose0}.$
Inductive hypothesis. Now, assume that the number of paths from ${0\choose0}$ to ${k\choose r}$ is ${k\choose r}$ for some $k\in\mathbb{Z}^+$.
Now, how many ways are there to get to ${k+1\choose r}$? First, we note that in order to get to ${k+1\choose r}$, we must come from either ${k\choose r}$ or ${k\choose r-1}$, since they are directly to the upper-right and upper-left, respectively. Therefore, there are ${k\choose r} + {k\choose r-1} = {k+1\choose r}$ ways to get to ${k+1\choose r}$.
Note that in the above argument, $r\ne k+1$. To get this case, we see that the only choice is to run along the right edge, giving us a single path.
To really flesh out this proof, you should prove two things I glossed over: