I heard that there's some hard way to mechanically obtain a recurrence relation for a given sequence. Do you know something about it/where can I find information about it?
2026-05-14 17:47:54.1778780874
Given a random sequence give a recurrence defining it.
328 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DISCRETE-MATHEMATICS
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Solving discrete recursion equations with min in the equation
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
Related Questions in RECURRENCE-RELATIONS
- Recurrence Relation for Towers of Hanoi
- Solve recurrence equation: $a_{n}=(n-1)(a_{n-1}+a_{n-2})$
- General way to solve linear recursive questions
- Approximate x+1 without addition and logarithms
- Recurrence relation of the series
- first order inhomogeneous linear difference equation general solution
- Guess formula for sequence in FriCAS
- Solve the following recurrence relation: $a_{n}=10a_{n-2}$
- Find closed form for $a_n=2\frac{n-1}{n}a_{n-1}-2\frac{n-2}{n}a_{n-2}$ for all $n \ge 3$
- Young Tableaux generating function
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Recurrence relations come in all shapes and sizes. You're probably familiar with $n!$ or the Fibonacci numbers being described as recurrence relations. But, there are some bizarre ones out there. For example:
We are limited only by our imaginations in finding bizarre (and perhaps highly contrived) recurrence relations.
Now imagine we were given some bizarre and highly contrived sequence generated by a recurrence relation, but we have forgotten the recurrence relation and want to recover it. There is basically no hope whatsoever of doing so (nor would there be much point).
Further, we can only look at a finite number of terms in a given sequence. Given that finite number of terms, we could fit an infinite number of (even linear homogenous) recurrence relations to them: If we know $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$, then we define a sequence $(x_i)_{i \geq 1}$ recursively by $$x_i=\begin{cases} a_i & \text{ for } i \in \{1,2,\ldots,N\}; \\ c & \text{if } i=N+1 \text{ (for any } c \in \mathbb{R} \text{)}; \\ \sum_{i=n-N-2}^{n-1} x_i & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$ We get an infinite number of recurrence relations by the choice of $c$. So, in practice, even in one of the simplest cases (linear homogeneous recurrence) it is not possible to go backwards from an infinite sequence to a recurrence relation.
That being said, there are ways to "guess" a recurrence given the first few terms in a sequence.
To illustrate, the first few Fibonacci numbers are $1$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $5$. We could guess there's a linear homogeneous recurrence for this sequence of the form $a_{n+1}=c a_n + d a_{n-1}$. We check to see if this works:
We see $1,1,2$ occur sequentially, so, if $a_{n+1}=c a_n + d a_{n-1}$ is correct, then we must have $2=c+d$.
We see $1,2,3$ occur sequentially, so $3=2c+d$.
We see $2,3,5$ occur sequentially, so $5=3c+2d$. (We could keep going if we like.)
So, we have a system of equations: $$ \left(\begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 1 \\ 3 & 2 \\ \end{matrix}\right) \left(\begin{matrix} c \\ d \\ \end{matrix}\right) = \left(\begin{matrix} 2 \\ 3 \\ 5 \\ \end{matrix}\right) $$ which we solve to find $c=1$ and $d=1$. So our guess is that the recurrence is $a_{n+1}=a_n + a_{n-1}$. But we can't know for sure without knowing that the sequence is indeed the Fibonacci sequence (and we can't know that without inspecting all infinitely many terms, or the recurrence relation defining these numbers [or something equivalent]).