Let $m$ and $n$ be natural numbers. How many pairs $x$ and $y$ of natural numbers with $m\cdot x+n\cdot y=m\cdot n$ are there ?
2026-03-29 16:01:17.1774800077
Greatest Common Divisor question
74 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NATURAL-NUMBERS
- Recursive Induction Floor Proof Help
- Countable set example
- Bound a natural by two consecutive powers
- Set theory that proves that if its consistient, is only proves true things about arithmetic
- $n$ is natural number. What is the result of $(-1)^{2n}-(-1)^{4n-1}-1^{n+1}-(-2)^3$
- Given a sufficiently large integer $N$, is it true that there are more primes than perfect squares in $[1,N]$?
- How to show that $(S\cup\{0\},\ge)$ is order-isomorphic to $(S,\ge)$?
- Some questions about the successor function
- What IS the successor function without saying $S(n) = n + 1$?
- Prove addition is commutative using axioms, definitions, and induction
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think MLT's comment is pretty much the answer. Since he gave two points that make a line segment of our interest, the problem is to count the integer points on the segment.
Draw a plane and see that $mx + ny = mn$ is a line that passes $(n, 0), (0, m)$. Any pair of natural number $(x, y)$ must be on this line segment. We already obtained two points precisely when $y = 0$ and $x = 0$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that these cannot happen simultaneously.
Let's solve the case when $m, n$ are coprime. It is intuitively clear that there is no more than the two trivial points that the line passes on the first quadrant. If not, we have a nontrivial solution $(x_{0}, y_{0}) \in \mathbb{Z}_{+} \times \mathbb{Z}_{+}$ so that $mx_{0} = n(y_{0} - m)$, so by Eucild's lemma, $n | x_{0}$. By symmetry, we must have $m | y_{0}$, so we may write $x_{0} = nx_{1}$ and $y_{0} = my_{1}$ for some nontrivial $x_{1}, y_{1}$. This gives a contradiction since $mnx_{1} + mny_{1} = mx_{0} + ny_{0} = mn$ implies $x_{1} + y_{1} = 1$.
Now let's move on to the general case. Let $d$ be the greatest common divisor of $m, n$ and write $m = dm_{0}$ and $n = dn_{0}$, where $m_{0}, n_{0}$ are coprime. Then we may seek solutions to $m_{0}x + n_{0}y = dm_{0}n_{0}$. We go over the same proof again with some modification. Suppose that $(x_{0}, y_{0})$ is a nontrivial solution so that $x_{0}, y_{0} \neq 0$. Then $mx_{0} = n_{0}(dm_{0} - y_{0})$, so $n_{0} | x_{0}$ and also $m_{0} | y_{0}$ by symmetry. Thus we may write $x_{0} = n_{0}x_{1}$ and $y_{0} = m_{0}x_{1}$. Now $m_{0}n_{0}(x_{1} + y_{1}) = m_{0}x_{0} + n_{0}y_{0} = dm_{0}n_{0}$, so $x_{1} + y_{1} = d$.
Conversely, if $x_{0} = n_{0}x_{1}$ and $y_{0} = m_{0}y_{1}$ with $x_{1} + y_{1} = d$, then $(x_{0}, y_{0})$ is a solution. We incidentally showed that a nontrivial pair $(x_{0}, y_{0})$ is a solution if and only if if $x_{0} = n_{0}x_{1}$ and $y_{0} = m_{0}y_{1}$ for some nontrivial pair $(x_{1}, y_{1})$ with $x_{1} + y_{1} = d$. There are precisely $d - 1$ of them, so we must have $d - 1 + 2 = d + 1$ solutions.