We know that the sum of the reciprocals of all prime numbers diverges (that is, $\displaystyle\sum_{p\text { is prime}}p^{-1}=\infty$) and the sum of the reciprocals of all perfect squares converges (that is, $\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}k^{-2}<\infty$). Does this result imply that the set of prime numbers is more "dense" than the set of perfect squares; that is, given a sufficiently large integer $N$, there are always more primes than perfect squares in the closed interval $[1,N]$? If so, how about the answer to the following generalised question:
For a fixed positive number $\varepsilon$, does there exist a positive integer $N_{\varepsilon}$ such that if $N>N_{\varepsilon}$, there are always more primes than numbers of the form $k^{1+\varepsilon}$ (where $k$ is a positive number) in the closed interval $[1,N]$?
My guess is that the answer appears to be yes, since $\displaystyle\sum_{p\text { is prime}}p^{-1}=\infty$ whilst $\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}k^{-1-\varepsilon}<\infty$.
Your guessed right!
According to the prime number theorem, the number primes less than $N$ grows approximately at the rate $N/\ln N$ where as the number of numbers of the form $k^{1+\epsilon}$ which are less than $N$ grow at the rate $N^{1/(1+\epsilon)}$. Thus clearly number of primes grow faster because beyond a certain point, for every $\epsilon$, $\ln N$ will eventually grow slower than $N^{\epsilon/(1+\epsilon)}$.