I am trying to expand the commutator $\left[ {{H_0},S} \right]$ to get the ${H_1}$ according to the equation: $${H_1} = {H_I} + \left[ {{H_0},S} \right],$$ where, $${H_I} = {g_k}\left[ {\left( {{b_k} + b_k^\dagger } \right){\sigma ^ + } + h.c.} \right],$$ $${H_0} = \left( {{\omega _k}b_k^\dagger{b_k} + {\Omega \over 2}{\sigma _z}} \right),$$ $$S = \left( {{A_k}b_k^\dagger{\sigma ^ + } - {A_k}{b_k}{\sigma ^ - }} \right),$$ where ${b_k^\dagger }$, ${b_k}$ are the creation and annihilation operators, ${\sigma _{x,y,z}}$ are the Pauli operators I reach to: $${H_1} = {H_I} + {H_0}S - S{H_0},$$ with: $${H_0}S = {\omega _k}{A_k}b_k^\dagger{b_k}b_k^\dagger{\sigma ^ + } - {A_k}{\omega _k}b_k^\dagger{b_k}{b_k}{\sigma ^ - } + {\Omega \over 2}{A_k}{\sigma _z}b_k^\dagger{\sigma ^ + } - {\Omega \over 2}{A_k}{\sigma _z}{b_k}{\sigma ^ - },$$ $$S{H_0} = {A_k}{\omega _k}b_k^\dagger\sigma b_k^\dagger{b_k} + {A_k}{\Omega \over 2}b_k^\dagger\sigma {\sigma _z} - {A_k}{\omega _k}{b_k}{\sigma ^ - }b_k^\dagger{b_k} - {A_k}{\Omega \over 2}{b_k}{\sigma ^ - }{\sigma _z}$$ But I failed to simplify the result as in the original search, where: $${H_1} = {g_k}\left( {{b_k} + b_k^\dagger} \right){\sigma ^ + } + {A_k}\left( {{\omega _k} + \Omega } \right)b_k^\dagger{\sigma ^ + } + h.c.$$ I expect thet he used some kind of relations to get this simplified form. Please help with this simple problem?
2026-03-26 22:13:09.1774563189
Help in "commutator expansion" containing creation and annihilation operators
127 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Related Questions in QUANTUM-COMPUTATION
- Show that R is a rotation of the Bloch sphere
- In the Bloch representation why pre and post multiply by rotation operator?
- How to find the projection matrix to find the projection along one of the basis matrices?
- Proving unitary similarity between two Hermitian operators with the same eigenvalues
- Why are n-1 linearly independent equations sufficient to solve for the secret string in Simon's algorithm?
- Reduced density operators of a pure Bipartite state?
- Understanding of matrix XOR product
- Quantum cirucit with two hadamard gates - unitary matrix & eigenvalues
- What geometry or topology best embodies the nonlocality of quantum entanglement?
- Evaluating $|\frac{1}{2}(|a\rangle \otimes|b\rangle+|b\rangle\otimes |a\rangle) |^2$
Related Questions in QUANTUM-INFORMATION
- Characterizing families of $p^2$ orthogonal $p \times p$ unitaries?
- Question concerning Stirling’s Approximation
- Does $\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})=\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}^*$ in infinite dimensions?
- Difference between operator defined on a space and operator represented in a space
- Problem in quantum information theory
- What is the essential difference between classical and quantum information geometry?
- The Kraus representation of a completely depolarising channel
- Intuition for Kitaev's geometrical lemma
- How do unitary matrices preserve the magnitude of unit vectors?
- How can one define the quantum interferometric power in the case of a multiparametric system using the quantum Fisher information matrix?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We have : \begin{align} [H_0,S] &= \left [ \omega_k b^\dagger_k b_k + \frac{\Omega}{2}\sigma_z, A_kb_k^\dagger \sigma^+ - A_kb_k\sigma^-\right]\\ &=\omega_kA_k\left[b_k^\dagger b_k,b_k^\dagger\sigma^+-b_k\sigma^-\right] + \frac{A_k\Omega}{2}\left[\sigma_z,b_k^\dagger \sigma^+ - b_k\sigma^-\right] \end{align}
Now, we can use : \begin{align} \left[b_k,b_k^\dagger\right] &= 1 \\ \left[b_k,\sigma^+\right]&= \left[b_k,\sigma^-\right] = \left[b_k,\sigma_z\right] = 0 \\ \left[b_k^\dagger,\sigma^+\right]&= \left[b_k^\dagger,\sigma^-\right] = \left[b_k^\dagger,\sigma_z\right] = 0 \\ [\sigma_z,\sigma^+] &= 2\sigma^+\\ [\sigma_z,\sigma^-] &= -2\sigma^- \end{align} to get : $$[H_0,S] = \omega_k A_k b_k^\dagger \sigma^+ + \omega_k A_kb_k\sigma^- + {A_k\Omega}(b^\dagger_k \sigma^+ + b_k\sigma^-) = A_k(\omega_k + \Omega)b_k^\dagger\sigma^+ + \text{h.c}$$