Help proving $\lnot$(G $\rightarrow$ $\lnot$A) $\vdash$ G.

117 Views Asked by At

I'm have been working on a natural deduction assignment for a couple of days and I went yesterday to ask my teacher for help but he gave me no helpful information so I'm asking here. I have tried a couple different methods but each one has just ended up in a loop of opening indirect proofs to discharge the assumption of the previous proof.

I'm trying to prove $\lnot$(G $\rightarrow$ $\lnot$A) $\vdash$ G.

The only path I haven't tried yet is using a material conditional equivalency but I don't think ($\lnot$G $\rightarrow$ A) $\equiv$ (G $\lor$ A) is the same as (G $\rightarrow$ $\lnot$A) $\equiv$ ($\lnot$G $\lor$ A).

At this point any advice that can help me find a path through this proof or a hint in the right direction would be amazing.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On

With Natural Deduction.

  1. $\lnot (G \to \lnot A)$ --- premise

  2. $\lnot G$ --- assumed [a]

  3. $G$ --- assumed [b]

  4. $\lnot A$ --- from 2) and 3) using rules for negation

  5. $(G \to \lnot A)$ --- from 3) and 4) by $(\to \text I)$ discharging [b]

  6. $\lnot \lnot G$ --- from 1) and 5) using rules for negation and discharging [a]

  1. $G$ --- from 6) by Double Negation.

Conclusion: we have proved $\lnot (G \to \lnot A) \vdash G$.

0
On

This (with P instead of $G$ and Q instead of $\neg A$) is an exercise in my Intro to Formal Logic. I'm pasting below the answer (or rather, one of the answers) from the on-line answers.

You might find the relevant chapters of the book and the on-line answers to exercises useful back-up to your work on natural deduction. Everything is freely downloadable from https://www.logicmatters.net/ifl.

enter image description here