Heuristic in quotient rings with linear relations?

46 Views Asked by At

Artin Algebra Chapter 11. Some solutions are here and here.

enter image description here

It looks like all I have to do is find an integer that equals $0$ if the answer turns out to be $\mathbb Z/(n)$, which is the case for the exercises above. I get

(a) Multiply 3 to get 15=18. $n=3$ (b) Multiply 2 to get 20=6. $n=14$ (3) Factor $\alpha^2+\alpha$ to get 1=0. $n=1$

  1. What is the basis for this heuristic? Is this merely a way to guess? Is this a coincidence?

  2. How can I do it for the exercises below (c) and (d)? (Adjoining elements is not introduced until the next section)

enter image description here

(c) $6=0$, but $2\alpha-1=0$.

It turns out we're not in $\mathbb Z/(6)$ but in $\mathbb Z/(n)$ for some $n$ where $6=0$, $n=1,2,3,6$.

Multiplying 3 I get $6\alpha-3=0=-3$. Then $n=3$.

It turns out $n=14$ in 5.4(b) was lucky and so actually requires more proof?

(d) How do I do similarly to show $7=0$ for $2\alpha^2-4=0=4\alpha-5$?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

For 5.4.(a), (b), (c); it can be a way to guess the solution, but then you still have to prove that it works.

The fact that it works for these is not a coincidence, but the fact that each time, modulo the $n$ that you find, $\alpha$ is some integer, so you "haven't actually adjoined anything".

Indeed for (a), $3=0$, and $2\alpha =6$ so $2\alpha =0$ and so $\alpha = 3\alpha -2\alpha = 0$. For (b), you have $\alpha =10$ that's given; and for (c) there's only one ring in which $1=0$.

For 4.3, you need to be careful : you won't always be in the situation where $\alpha$ (the class of $x$) is actually an integer; so you may have to deal with extensions of $\mathbb{Z}/(n)$