I have a product
$\prod_{n=2}^{\infty}{\ln{n}}$
which fails the standard test for convergence with
$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}{\ln(\ln(x))}$
not converging. However, I am aware that that other seemingly divergent sums have associated values, such as the sum of all natural numbers, which comes from the Riemann zeta function. So how can I be sure that this indeed diverges?
As a side note, I noticed that the partial sums
$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{n=2}^{k}{\ln(\ln(x))}$
appear to be converging on a line with the slope probably between $1<m<2$. I haven't been able to check this for very very large values, but it seems to hold true for the partial sums atleast $k < 2000$
Edit:
It recently came to my attention that I may be able assign a value with the zeta function by using the sum above, but I'm not sure how.
Seeing how you understand that the sum diverges (as per usual definition) and at the same time ask if it "indeed diverges", I interpret the latter as a new term you implicitly introduce where "sum X indeed diverges" means "sum X can't have a value associated with it one way or another".
But if we interpret the question this way, no, you can't be sure: even if the product "indeed diverges" now, there is a chance that someone later will invent some other way to associate a value with it. Basically, predicate "X indeed diverges" is ill-defined.